Study on the future cost of global warming

[Christophe]

Good enough zenfants! Otherwise I will be all red!

[bham]

Good enough zenfants! Otherwise I will be all red!

Good dad, but it's him that started, na!
Crush then, it's not zuste !!

[Christophe]

Do not care !
You go to bed without eating if it continues !!

[Woodcutter]

A post that could have be interesting...

[Christophe]

Almost 15 years later, where are we really?

[Forhorse]

We took a big step forward, so the chasm got closer?

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

We took a big step forward, so the chasm got closer?

So far it vAAAAAaaaa
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A

[ABC2019]

According to him, if nothing is done, global warming could cost 5 to 20% of the GDP of the world economy each year.

In fact it has increased by 50% since 2006 (and fossil consumption by 20%), and the only years when it has decreased are those when fossil consumption has decreased ... no correlation, however, with the temperature at my knowledge.

Any normal mind would conclude that it is the availability of fossils, and not the average temperature of the Earth, that is the most important factor for economic growth ...

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

however, no correlation with the temperature to my knowledge.

Any normal mind would conclude that it is the availability of fossils, and not the average temperature of the Earth, that is the most important factor for economic growth ...

Any normal mind would conclude that unlike financial flows which are measurable and available in real time, we could not measure the influence of an increase, or a one-time or lasting decrease in the use of fossils, their effects being Obviously unavailable and not immediately measurable Conclusion: Bozo does not know anything but takes a position in favor of pollution for very short-term commercial reasons. Basically he continues to give a damn about the planet and everything that populates it.

[ABC2019]

however, no correlation with the temperature to my knowledge.

Any normal mind would conclude that it is the availability of fossils, and not the average temperature of the Earth, that is the most important factor for economic growth ...

Any normal mind would conclude that unlike financial flows which are measurable and available in real time, we could not measure the influence of an increase, or a one-time or lasting decrease in the use of fossils, their effects being obviously unavailable and not immediately measurable.

if it's not measurable, then whoever said

global warming could cost 5 to 20% of the GDP of the global economy each year.

is a complete charlot, how can you announce numbers, on something that cannot be measured?

we are really in "the nave of fools" ....