I must say that honestly no, I hadn't anticipated this at the start, but the forum opened my eyes.
Then it was only very careful that I established links (because anyway the background we already knew, it just had to match with reality and it badly matched ...)
And if even
Point (left newspaper as everyone knows
) says that "
It's dangerous", it must be ...
that
Point does not say, it is that the theoretical model imposes this paradigm of control of the populations and that it is agreed by the people, whatever the political movement in power (cf "
need of constraint"found in the study of
Masslow pyramid, but not only).
To their discharge, it is good that they are aware of the drift and that they say it! Boudioux it must be the right that comes out of the wood to denounce the security drift of the left: in what world we live!
What is not normal and new is that they take advantage of it and wallow on the sovereign's vote ...
There it risks slipping and hurting.
In any case, they take measures and measures contrary to ethical common sense, and that is why Holland is wet to the neck. The FN is likely to win and it is France that will have lost.
What is funny is the Argentinian tango that Hollande is playing with Russia, fast, fast, slow ... A blow is a step aside for cooperation in strikes, a blow is two steps in back to re-align with Oabma ...