Ptilu wrote:You should learn about Bolzmann's reasoning, it would open up your perspective and your understanding of the reality of the universe. As for the quantum behavior of the infinitely large, I do not know where to look for it, because the fact that general relativity is profoundly deterministic is one of the great contradictions of physics ...
I grant you that Bolzmann was a very good statistician. on the other hand, it was also a big ball of 19eme ...
Let's take a closer look at the guy:
"Ludwig Boltzmann is also one of the first European scientists to recognize the scope of the theory of electromagnetism as formulated by Maxwell. His many contributions in this field include in particular the confirmation of Maxwell's prediction"
It's crisp, because, how to forget that the existence of magnetic monopolies highlighted by Dirac or experimentally at the ILL of Grenoble or by Marko Rodin, invalidate Maxwell's equations. who, therefore, make a better coffee, than just equations.
"All his life, Boltzmann tried to demonstrate the second principle of thermodynamics from molecular statistics ..."
So, curious as coincidence, if he had been the 20eme, he would have been part of the IPCC ;-) and anti-free energy lobby.
Note that his obstinacy did not bring him luck, he committed suicide ...
Then, with respect to the relativity of our friend Einstein, whom you branded as a rigid proof, do not forget that he was more cautious, to see a lot more cunning and foreseeing a triple action fuse, which is the least we can expect from a member of the chosen people. He invented EPR, the magic toolbox to repair the theories that despair, which today avoided him turning in his grave with the scalar waves that do not respect the rules of electromagnetism or light gain, which gives us proof that the limit of the speed of light was not one.
So even on a large scale, your argument of relativity queen, does not hold.
To go faster than light ...
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v4 ... 277a0.html
I persist and sign, the more our knowledge progresses, the more we see the climate behave like a quantum electromagnetic model, and therefore, that human thought can influence.
Well, it reminds me of the rain dance that man has been doing since 800000 years.
To persist in opposing science and consciousness is very doubtful and more like a control of the masses than of pragmatism.
The day when the slave becomes king, the earth trembles, as the other said in the book, and this is probably the reason for this desire to control the mass of slaves whose instrumentalized science is the weapon .
Ptilu, under your sweet and fragile name, hides a formidable warrior.
It's well played, I must recognize.