by Bougonnator » 29/01/08, 15:45
Hello,
So be a little less intransigent. An SUV consumes more than a Smart, but to have as much room in the trunk, it would 2 or 3 Smart that pollute more than one Outlander to go on vacation with the family. And families can not have a vehicle for every use.
We do not all have the same needs and we can claim the right to ride different. I'm acting as the devil's advocate, but you have to be a little over-debate and look with the eyes of someone else, or else you're falling into extremism.
For the green premium, OK have to see ..., but a new Outlander Euro4 certainly pollutes less than my sedan 1998, which itself was better than my sedan year IV (20 ventose exactly).
It is not the vehicle that pollutes but the use that one makes of it. Let me explain: I also have a Euro4 vehicle but considered very polluting. But I do not use it to go to the city or to go to the corks of the Parisian suburbs. I keep it for the weekend and during the week I take the kids on foot to school.
In one year I did less than 12Mkm with, vacation included, and I certainly less polluted than someone who would make 25Mkm in Logan or 10Mkm of city with what you want.
You can go down in flames because I have this vehicle, but when I drive in Prius (as much as necessary), I notice that nobody says thank you, or congratulates me. Strange no? However, living in the suburbs I can not come on the capital by bike with my children on the luggage rack to 40km. As for the suburban train at night ... I'll let you try.
To return to the Outlander in diesel version, it is sold by PSA with a PSA engine and by Mitsu with a VAG engine (that of the Golf). When I say where it's made, I'll say it everywhere, like most cars today. Do not think that French cars are built in France, or so little. They come, and more and more, from low-cost countries, ie from Eastern Europe, Latin America, and soon from Asia: the cost of manufacturing by ch ' children is inferior to that of big boat transport.
0 x