The ecology sect

[Christophe]

I suggest you send them a sample of our skills

I do not understand what you want to do exactly ... This story is now old I have no time to lose with these clowns as mentioned above ...

[Capt_Maloche]

indeed

October 2005 ...

[Christophe]

No October is my reaction ... the article dated a few months earlier ... April or May 2005 I think ...

[Charlotte]

I see that the subject dates, but it strikes me that a group of extremists throws stones at Econologie because they do not get half of the articles. Excuse me, but are you idiots?

It's true that the technical articles on your site are, inevitably, technical Even with an engineer father and a scientific background, I do not always get much, but it's people like you that we need. And that's not to lick.

As you said in one of your introductory articles on econology, when we try to reconcile the irreconcilable, we take stones on all sides. This is how fundamentalists do not like to try to qualify their speech (it would be the equivalent for them to give ground to dad, is not it, Sigmund?)

But it was really the moment when a discourse appeared that took into account the complexity of the problem and the reality of the world.

[/ mode censoring the guru]

[I Citro]

I see that the subject dates, but it strikes me that a group of extremists throws stones at Econologie because they do not get half of the articles. Excuse me, but are you idiots?

It's true that the technical articles on your site are, inevitably, technical Even with an engineer father and a scientific background, I do not always get much, but it's people like you that we need. And that's not to lick.

As you said in one of your introductory articles on econology, when we try to reconcile the irreconcilable, we take stones on all sides. This is how fundamentalists do not like to try to qualify their speech (it would be the equivalent for them to give ground to dad, is not it, Sigmund?)

But it was really the moment when a discourse appeared that took into account the complexity of the problem and the reality of the world.

[/ mode censoring the guru]

I really like Charlotte
And what a blogger!
Not true?

[vttdechaine]

Raoul Anvélot is the name of Vincent Cheynet it seems. Just read the papers about him to see the extremism of the gentleman (anti-pub so for me anti-information). A lot of sensationalism to sell his papers and try to live on them. It is sad but so common.

Quote from this brave man: "Talking about freedom of expression about an advertisement is like talking about a corporate citizen ..."

[Charlotte]

I really like Charlotte
And what a blogger!
Not true?

Wow! This is the first time I'm called a blogger.

[Christophe]

Raoul Anvélot is the name of Vincent Cheynet it seems. Just read the papers about him to see the extremism of the gentleman (anti-pub so for me anti-information). A lot of sensationalism to sell his papers and try to live on them. It is sad but so common.

Quote from this brave man: "Talking about freedom of expression about an advertisement is like talking about a corporate citizen ..."

I did not know all this (except that it was a nickname) but already hiding behind a nickname says a lot about the guy ... Easier to spit on people when we assume not ... Sometimes I wonder pkoi I do not do the same ... it must be honesty ...

ps: are you sure it's not cheney? Which would explain a lot of things ...

[Charlotte]

And then Anvélot, not only is it borrowed from Queneau (except that it is "hanvélos" and that they are gendarmes), but in addition it is a little double-barreled. Would I publish under the pseudo Odile Hambus, me?

How is that not the right topic?

[Christophe]

Would I publish under the pseudonym Odile Hambus?

Are you in a hurry to become a blog editor?