New forum to come, what do you want as functions?

[Obamot]

You wouldn't be talking about the "Report" and [x] message erase button instead.
If so, is it confusing?

Go for 3 levels, it's already good.
Leave it in red, it sucked me too.

Aesthetic question ...:
Compare in blue.

[Christophe]

You wouldn't be talking about the "Report" button instead.
If so, is it confusing?

Fly over you will see

Go for 3 levels, it's already good.
Leave it in red, that's fine too.
Aesthetic question ...:
Compare in blue.

Blue will inevitably come out less well: it's good readability you want no?

[Obamot]

Yes, so everything is cool.

Just the 3 levels: have you done white -> gray -> white now?

blah-blah-blah

blah-blah-blah

Hello Hello hello...

It is true that now the goal is achieved.
We're talking about cosmetic details, huh. No problem.

[Flytox]

For the writing of the answers and in particular when one wants to put attachments, the "screen keys" to click are very dispersed in height, it is necessary to scroll a lot to walk etc ... we will not be able to make a "group" of the commands on the same line for example?

Uh, I do not understand, can you develop? With a screenshot for example?

Uh, not on my screen at the moment but on a small laptop with a tiny screen ..... the answer at the end of the week.

[Christophe]

Yes, so everything is cool.

Just the 3 levels: have you done white -> gray -> white now?

It was not voluntary (intermediate step) but finally it's not so bad ...

On the other hand a strange thing: a few weeks ago I had configured for the entirety of the quotes either in italics ... except it is no longer the case.

As if "something" was crushing personalization on a regular basis?

If you remember correctly, in February I also put the quotes in white with red border (which you liked a lot at the time) ... and this setting is also passed by the trap ...

So watch, if you see any change not expected..Prefer me that I look a little ...

[Obamot]

In any case already a big thanks for this first point!

This, however, is by far a priority:

concerned THE CITATIONS.

1) It is sometimes frustrating not to have a simple reference in these, on the original post, to check the content.

Currently they are as follows:

Yes it's possible...

... whereas it would be good if we could click to go back to the source of the message with something like this:

Yes it's possible...

Because it is sometimes very useful to have the entire content (and / or the context) to better respond, and sometimes better to clarify the content. And it is frustrating to have to trace the thread "by hand" sometimes over several pages to finally come across the author's original text.

And I'm absolutely certain that this is an AUTOMATIC default function (I only simulated it) since so many forums in phpBB already have it in majority.

In any case it is absolutely certain that it is possible to activate it.

I do not understand why there is not more enthusiasm than that to implement a function that all forum a little serious should be! Indeed, when the issue is to restore the truth easily to a possible falsification of the words (as was the case when reporting son to the content of abusive posts) I have no doubt that you will hasten to do so .

My feeling is that one can not denounce the odious falsifications in the EPR file, and on the other hand, do not make every effort to establish the basic transparency that would be appropriate for an EPR. forum as econology: it makes me tick, because it requires well to source / date external info WITH LINK (which requires effort), so why not internally the same care and so easy when it is implemented!

[Christophe]

And I'm absolutely certain that this is an AUTOMATIC default function (I only simulated it) since so many forums in phpBB already have it in majority.

In any case it is absolutely certain that it is possible to activate it.

Bin I have never seen this function on a phpBB but I want to see examples (in MP) ... I saw it's not a trick in the basic config (or I have seen badly at the time of migration ???)

[Christophe]

It's a mod (so not native): https://www.phpbb.com/customise/db/mod/ ... 28qpbl%29/

But it has not been adapted for the 3.1 version ... after 1 minute of research

[Janic]

It's pretty full!
personally I regret the last 150 posts. By cons I have 17 unread pages because not all topics do not connect me and more access to the last.

[Obamot]

+ 1: yes, eh ..!

It's a mod (so not native): https://www.phpbb.com/customise/db/mod/ ... 28qpbl%29/

But it has not been adapted for the 3.1 version ... after 1 minute of research

Ah yes but hey, oh big Imothep, if it already works with the 3.0.12 it must be all right no? It will surely work with 3.1 because it may mean "works from there V3.0.12(Or it will work in a long time, hey ...).

I prostrate myself at your feet [...]