NOR RESISTANCE OR PROGRAM (Stratagems of Change)

[Christophe]

Mwarf it stayed 2 minutes???

Apr 26, 2009, 01:23 Tognopop (talk | contributions) (5 bytes) (Revoke changes by 620; revert to Venom version (I hesitate to return...)) (to do)

Well, he still hesitated, that means there was common sense in my modification.

Still, I didn't even say "sarkozy or UMP"... Well, someone hands it over?

* To the speeches of the UMP or Sarkozy

If I do it myself, it may be seen via my IP

[Ahmed]

You wrote:

-to modern political discourse.

Why "modern"? Wasn't that true in the past, do you think?

[Christophe]

Well no, but I think that since the arrival of Sarko (and the UMP in general) it's worse: he has the art of "seducing" the crowds with barnumic speeches!

"Work more... Blablabla..." is a good example: everyone recognized each other (except me! I don't have to work anymore: I'm already on the job! ) and everyone got screwed...

Another excellent example is De Gaulle's "I understood you"...

So if we all agree on this point: pkoi the wiki guys censored it?

I think that if more of us insist on putting it back, they will leave it (wiki is democratic)...but me with my IP is burned out now...

[nonoLeRobot]

Precisely if it is democratic, it is necessary to argue in the comments or discussion page of the addition or even discuss directly with the moderator. But the number should not make the result. As a guy from the forum"It's not because many of them are wrong that they are right".

In my opinion the "modern" is indeed too much.

[Cuicui]

In my opinion the "modern" is indeed too much.

Or "to certain political speeches"? It would be indisputable...

[Cuicui]

In my opinion the "modern" is indeed too much.

Or "to certain political speeches"? It would be indisputable...

I just posted it on Wikipedia at 15:17 p.m.

[gegyx]

I just posted it on Wikipedia at 15:17 p.m.

You made a reference to JPP, I hope, to put the odds on your side...


Democratic Wikipedia...

[nonoLeRobot]

It's already removed, for "unsourced" reason. I'm not sure the rest is sourced.

At least we can't say that they are not reactive... It may not be so bad.

[Christophe]

Not sourced?

In this case quote the sarkozyst scam on purchasing power and work it more (to get deeper!) or more reasonable: the speech of Algiers by DeGaulle...

Reactive yes but if it's for censoring what "generates" so...I thought wiki was more democratic...I'm disappointed...

[Lukas Stella]

It is sometimes prudent to reread yourself.
Sorry...
Lukas Stella