There is confusion in terms. And somewhere she is willing to deceive the public ... (But it was done little by little.)
A long time ago the "
direct"is no longer live ... The drift had started with the slight deferred, in short the abandonment of"
real time"by the arrival of new techniques, and new means of broadcasting (in particular by satellite) which put back this notion of"
real time"in question (because mixing with the virtual) and which had been reviewed legally.
So-called direct, can very well be filmed / broadcast live, filmed / broadcast with a slight delay, or be a recording
supposed to have been recorded under "live conditions", so supposed to be recorded and not edited, neither taken again, nor selection of taken after blow (yes but that was the theory). The only constraint was that the recording should be recent (I do not remember how much, but I imagine not more than 24h, or 48h max, a little longer possibly for weekly programs.) And again it should depend on country.)
For example, if a weekly program is recorded on Tuesdays for broadcast in the grid on Saturday, in jargon it is said that:
- "
we put ourselves in "situation" of Saturday"
And this in order not to make a mistake during the recording by suddenly saying by mistake "
tomorrow is a holiday"(or what do I know)
Only the "direct live" or "live" is "real" direct in real time.
But all this is a vast masquerade, a total disrespect for the viewer (which shows perhaps the reason for its decommissioning), it is a vast humbness gradually come invade all the chains of Europe and the world, so that no one can take power in a media and blackmail it. Because physically impossible because the studios destined to recvoir of the public, are not connected to the final control room to be sent on the emitters (for that it is necessary to go to the television newscasts, but which are they kept like the banks or the airports ... )
First marginal digressions became commonplace and became symbols of enslavement against peoples.
► View Text
An offense that can be a "acts" or a "abstention from acting"as the situation should require, this is clearly a deception, since" real direct "would certainly cost less to produce (false direct often requiring"post prod"if only to cut" unwanted "passages) therefore it is very likely that the images of the lottery were not faked, because otherwise it would not have" passed "on the air!
So if the lottery is rigged (and it is a certain way) as already said, it's not worse: the lie is more serious and it is elsewhere.