[Abuse] Limit the duration to edit his messages

The developments of forums and the site. Humor and conviviality between the members of the forum - Tout est anything - Presentation of new registered members Relaxation, free time, leisure, sports, vacations, passions ... What do you do with your free time? Forum exchanges on our passions, activities, leisure ... creative or recreational! Publish your ads. Classifieds, cyber-actions and petitions, interesting sites, calendar, events, fairs, exhibitions, local initiatives, association activities .... No purely commercial advertising please.
User avatar
Macro
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6459
Registration: 04/12/08, 14:34
x 1610




by Macro » 10/04/12, 11:55

From the moment a journalist (or any other person) begins to manipulate the writings of others by removing parts of text that he considers non-essential, in my opinion he falsifies and directs the comments in the direction in which he is interested ...
0 x
The only thing safe in the future. It is that there may chance that it conforms to our expectations ...
User avatar
chatelot16
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6960
Registration: 11/11/07, 17:33
Location: Angouleme
x 264




by chatelot16 » 10/04/12, 14:34

I often site a very small part of the message to which I answer, but the site is not there to criticize the one who wrote it, it is just there to remind you to which part of the subject I answer ... when I do not answer not the last message posted but has an older message

the quote with a name, also allows to show to whom I answer

completely delete his old message?

it's very good that it is no longer possible!

otherwise we could write anything confusing everyone, and then erase everything, so as not to assume what we wrote ... and suddenly what would be written would have much less value
0 x
User avatar
I Citro
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5129
Registration: 08/03/06, 13:26
Location: Bordeaux
x 11




by I Citro » 10/04/12, 14:36

Obamot wrote:Besides it allows me to make two small requests going in the direction of more transparency, to complete what you say Macro and avoid it to a large extent, it would be nice to see appear:
date and time to which the original message was posted and from which the quote is taken (this would make it possible to verify a possible manipulation of date without tedious research).
- and to be even clearer,
add in the same quote: the small interactive square containing the link, which allows you to find the passage quoted with a single click.
As it appears in the header in our original messages, to the left of the indication:
[] Posted the:
As an example, as follows:

Ah too? : Cheesy:

Not to mention that it would save crazy time for mods ... and calm the nerves. : Mrgreen:
It is an excellent idea. : Idea:
I temper the remarks concerning malicious quotes by adding that very often we quote an erroneous author by mistake by extracting a quote from a response from a poster citing the author and by an unhappy CTRL + X, the person who quotes takes by inadvertently the place of the author ...
:?

The example of Obamot is interesting because its dates and times do not seem to correspond to subjects of quotation or author and shows that we can, in fact, make anyone say anything (and anytime).
:? And that's how some got famous (Rémi Gaillard). : Lol:
0 x