Christophe wrote:ps: what is a superfluous net?
This is what is "Boring" for eyes...
This is all that serves to "frame" what is not necessary, because it is your eye "who does the job", or the necessary clearance which is lost by a net => which creates unnecessary visual confusion for the eye which likes to adapt what it sees to its liking.
We should not believe that our eyes are inactive when we throw them a "baked" layout.
One trickle is fine, two boujour visual fatigue.
By way of example, let's take some text: as a reminder of the basic rules of typography, since typographic enrichment has made it possible to vary the fonts and the sizes of letters with the added bonus of bold, medium, light, in italic or no, etc, the rule would be thatwe don't use the underline at all (with rare exceptions) because it prevents reading letters that descend below the natural reading line followed by the eye, such as g, j, p, q, letters which, with the underline, become difficult to read:
gjpq while in bold: gjpq
Another justification for removing the redundancy of the rules is the justification of the text on the left / right. Who "frees" the page, without the need to add lines, because once again it is the eye that balances "in its own way" ... putting a line is "to impose a rigor" which he does not need ...
For the eyes: I prefer perch fillets,