Scams to the environment or energies: escrology?

The developments of forums and the site. Humor and conviviality between the members of the forum - Tout est anything - Presentation of new registered members Relaxation, free time, leisure, sports, vacations, passions ... What do you do with your free time? Forum exchanges on our passions, activities, leisure ... creative or recreational! Publish your ads. Classifieds, cyber-actions and petitions, interesting sites, calendar, events, fairs, exhibitions, local initiatives, association activities .... No purely commercial advertising please.
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79323
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 11044




by Christophe » 29/12/07, 13:47

We deviate a little too much from the subject of the escrologie there ... If you want to talk about "clean" nuclear (Iter, Zpinch et cie) please continue in the subject I just created:

Clean nuclear possible?

Thank you
0 x
Chatham
I posted 500 messages!
I posted 500 messages!
posts: 536
Registration: 03/12/07, 13:40




by Chatham » 29/12/07, 13:55

jean63 wrote:
I have already written on another post, that futs of waste coming from La Hague leave by whole trains in Siberia to be stored in the open air, of or corrosion of these futs until the drilling and spreading of radioactivity in this region, because wait for the solution to store in place on all these waste that have lifetimes of thousands or millions of years, it is a real ecological scam.



This statement is pure invention because long-lived, high-radiation waste is stored on site, and low-radiation waste (mainly tools, combinations, non-nuclear miscellaneous waste) is buried in controlled surface sites! : Evil:
0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79323
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 11044




by Christophe » 29/12/07, 13:56

Rah I see that we follow my "advice" ... : Cry: : Cry: : Cry:

Otherwise yes the "ecologists" tell, invent but especially relay times full of bullshit ... shame ...
0 x
Chazelle
I learn econologic
I learn econologic
posts: 19
Registration: 30/09/07, 19:31




by Chazelle » 29/12/07, 14:08

ecology does not rhyme with pollution and consumption (word that our "dear" president keeps repeating and drives the gend crazy)
but with economy, well being of the person and environment.
So, be a so-called state leader, stop proclaiming loud and clear, which must be consumed. It will never bring ecology to the fore and peace in the world between men
0 x
User avatar
Cuicui
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 3547
Registration: 26/04/05, 10:14
x 6




by Cuicui » 29/12/07, 14:45

Christophe wrote:We deviate a little too much from the subject of the escrologie there ... If you want to talk about "clean" nuclear (Iter, Zpinch et cie) please continue in the subject I just created:
Clean nuclear possible?
Thank you

Judicious decision.
A+
0 x
User avatar
jean63
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 2332
Registration: 15/12/05, 08:50
Location: Auvergne
x 4




by jean63 » 29/12/07, 18:10

OK, last intervention on the subject to answer chatam:

Chatham wrote:
jean63 wrote:
I have already written on another post, that futs of waste coming from La Hague leave by whole trains in Siberia to be stored in the open air, of or corrosion of these futs until the drilling and spreading of radioactivity in this region, because wait for the solution to store in place on all these waste that have lifetimes of thousands or millions of years, it is a real ecological scam.



This statement is pure invention because long-lived, high-radiation waste is stored on site, and low-radiation waste (mainly tools, combinations, non-nuclear miscellaneous waste) is buried in controlled surface sites! : Evil:

Yeah, I want to believe you.

I am not competent enough to talk about nuclear as it is used in CURRENT power plants and the waste produced, BUT what I do know are the consequences of the Chernobyl disaster (I saw a report on ARTE on this subject: it's SCARY for those who had to sacrifice themselves to "drown" the plant ........ and this is only the beginning of the consequences).

Good after that, everyone thinks what he wants.

I do not want to enter into sterile discussions on the subject.

Who will live will see ... if he can still in this very dangerous world.

I am very familiar with Jancovici's point of view, which I find very competent in the areas of global warming, but I find that he is taking a stolen exit to justify our frightened consumption of electricity. I do not feel outside consumers, but to say that there is no danger in the short, medium, long or very long term ... that's wrong.

Of course, tomorrow, we can receive a meteorite on the corner of the mouth, but here we can do nothing, it is not caused by the man.

Man has frankly exceeded the limits allowed with the delirious growth of the number of future nuclear power stations (Sarko is the commercial 1 of AREVA to sell our power stations to the Chinese, to Gaddafi ... etc) as well as the armament nuclear.

Other than that everything is fine; the nineteenth century is a good vintage.

Chatham you would not work in a nuclear power plant ?? are you so sure of your AFFIRMATION ??
This statement is pure invention Parts and accessories long-lived, high-radiation waste is stored on site, and low-radiation waste (mainly tools, combinations, non-nuclear various wastes) are buried in controlled surface sites!

So long-lived waste is stored in La Hague? Too bad I no longer have the references of the report on the transport of waste to Siberia.

I would say that to my son when he goes surfing on the Cotentin waves ... he will be very happy to know that he is so close to these good organic waste.
0 x
Only when he has brought down the last tree, the last river contaminated, the last fish caught that man will realize that money is not edible (Indian MOHAWK).
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79323
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 11044




by Christophe » 29/12/07, 18:15

PLEASE KNOW MORE NUCLEAR HERE but continue here: https://www.econologie.com/forums/energie-nu ... t4531.html
Last edited by Christophe the 29 / 12 / 07, 18: 20, 2 edited once.
0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79323
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 11044




by Christophe » 29/12/07, 18:18

Chazelle wrote:ecology does not rhyme with pollution and consumption (word that our "dear" president keeps repeating and drives the gend crazy)
but with economy, well being of the person and environment.
So, be a so-called state leader, stop proclaiming loud and clear, which must be consumed. It will never bring ecology to the fore and peace in the world between men



I agree but small details:

Ecology rhymes with economics (which gives econology) but surely not (yet?) Currently with the economy in the sense broad, ie, for example, GDP. On the contrary, GDP is based on the looting and the MASSIVE exploitation of resources ...

The more we PILL THE PLANET, the more GDP there is so the economists and therefore the politicians (who use the same bad indices completely dashed) BANDENT ...

Moreover, this *** put of GDP is not even corrected by the inflation which itself is largely incomplete ... but on the other hand it is largely due to the consumer credit ... From this point of view there the It is better for them to keep quiet to better lie and to impoverish people ... (consumer credit is only an impoverishment of the middle and lower classes) ....
0 x
bpval
I posted 500 messages!
I posted 500 messages!
posts: 561
Registration: 06/10/06, 17:27




by bpval » 29/12/07, 18:49

The more we PILL THE PLANET, the more GDP there is so the economists and therefore the politicians (who use the same bad indices completely dashed) BANDENT ...

Toutafé AGREE


I propose a new definition of GDP

INTERNATIONAL PILLAGE of the BLANETE

Damn it's not going !!!
FUCKING Image
0 x
PIF PAF POUM
User avatar
Arthur_64
Éconologue good!
Éconologue good!
posts: 224
Registration: 16/12/07, 13:49
Location: Pau (FR)




by Arthur_64 » 30/12/07, 09:10

Nevertheless, if attitudes change, we can create wealth, employment, and so on. with ecological solutions ...

If the United Arab Emirates used oil money to invest in research on oil substitutes, rather than in megalomaniac bullshit, they would be less bored the day when the black gold will be dried up.
0 x

Go back to "The bistro: site life, leisure and relaxation, humor and conviviality and Classifieds"

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 348 guests