Registration to forum mandatory ?

[Woodcutter]

I voted yes, I think it will not change much (except the avoidance of robots described by a forumabove) since you have to register to participate anyway.
People who are interested will register anyway.
On the other hand, from the strictly commercial point of view (advertising banners), it can reduce the number of daily connections ...

[SOURCEVERTE59]

come recently, regularly to visit many of the forums econology, it is with dismay that I learn that some of the information will be hidden or inaccessible.
particularly interested in forum on the hydrolysis of water, I realize that as soon as there is any profit whatsoever, the barriers and the secret prevails .It seemed (visibly wrong) that here the main goal was sharing for all, with the main goal of giving everyone energy independence at little cost (visibly I am a sweet dreamer) On the basis of secrecy and retentions of information we have looted the pecuniary resources of all those who work and those for years, make different choices please give simple and clear instructions so that everyone can for his own benefit have energy available galore. Do not change your surroundings to a cow milk is what happens everywhere, we are all tired of this society without generosity, thank you for spending a little time to read my joke.



green source59

[jp33]

Hi Christopher,
For flying over a lot of technical and technological sites "open to all" in recent months, I will answer no to the restriction to members only, because this would not prevent the recoveries as a person, patent and other placing on the market.
I do not think that the danger comes from the Industrialists because they have other cats to whip.
I will also recall that the systems we are interested in have been "given" to us to exploit.

PS: I still can not access the documents reserved for members. Is this normal ??

[lau]

I am of the same opinion as Nono, it is necessary to lock the critical parts like the rubric experimentation for example. Free access will not be hindered, but there will be a voluntary approach at least by registration.
I confess myself to have registered at the beginning for wanting to access the videos.

[Rabbit]

You too ?

[wirbelwind262]

Hello
I am for open source !!!!!!!!!!
NO RESTRICTION !!!!!
@ + good luck

[Christophe]

As some documents must require the password entry, therefore forum, the WM still has access to information about the members who register.

Uh ... there is no report (ie = they are independent) between the inscription to the forum (personal password) and as "member of the site" (public password broadcast on the mailing) to access the download of "protected" files. I hope to answer JP33 at the same time.

But it is true that gathering these 2 "membership" would be much more pleasant for the visitor who discovers the site ... (not to mention that there is still another account for the directory ...) ... I think to improve the system for a while but everything in its time ...

On the other hand, from the strictly commercial point of view (advertising banners), it can reduce the number of daily connections ...

I'm not worried about that (given the small amounts involved) ... it's rather the search engines that worry me.

Finally I think to do what has already been tested: the lock of the part "experimentation" (pantone and electricity for example) but as expected I await the end of the survey to decide!

[Christophe]

Hello
I am for open source !!!!!!!!!!
NO RESTRICTION !!!!!
@ + good luck

Me too but read my 1er message: if the software patents had existed in 1984 (during the beginnings of Linux) who tell you that Linux would have existed (at least as it currently exists ...) ... But actually this point of this will not change much: it's so easy to sign up for a forum...

[wirbelwind262]

The proof, I'm here !!!!!!!!!!!
moouuuuuaaaahhhh !!!! ......
Oops, I'm igniting!

[Christophe]

pffffff cannonball!