Good year 2010

[recyclinage]

please call a witness
tv forces

[recyclinage]

wake up the demon in you elephant but you can't count on me anymore

[recyclinage]

elephant my wife no longer want to wash your thongs
you have to admit it to your wife, ...

if not mine I feel that it will cause a scandal, ...

with biodegradable powder of course

[recyclinage]

I have no wife but please do as you please

[recyclinage]

<- men in blue

it's just man in blue, ...

[Christophe]

My wishes for 2010

Heads or tails,
ou
Heads and tails,
or ?...

It is not easy to present wishes to those who are dear to us when we know that a sword of Damocles is hanging on a wire above their heads. It is a bit like wishing a good trip to a friend who embarks on a ship that we know is taking on water. Because personally I am not very optimistic about our very near future. I hope I am wrong, but I have the impression that we like to act as if nothing had happened, in the hope that by not looking at the danger in the face it will pass by. If there is one thing that humans have learned, it is ostrich. Can we really believe that the storm has passed and that everything will “become as before” with a layer of
"Green growth"? Can we talk about recovery without blushing when we know that only the speculative economy has rebounded thanks to public funds while unemployment, private and corporate bankruptcies, defaults are increasing? Can we be optimistic in front of a world elite whose main action consists in hiding from the people by jets of perlimpinpin powder their only concern to save the system and the dominant interests which it nourishes? But what do I know myself? Am I smarter than the others? One thing particularly struck me in 2009.

How we are prisoners of duality. What I am saying
This is not a scoop, is it? Duality is inevitable since it is part of our nature. No light without darkness, no high without low, no truth without a lie ... But what is the good side of the room? The one who can bring us happiness ... Head or head? The side of the good without a doubt; yes but still, the good, it is on the stack side or the face side?

It was this H1N1 flu saga that highlighted for me how difficult it is to form an opinion. Isn't it paradoxical? Until recently, man must have had a hard time making conscious choices because he was sorely lacking in information. But today, this is no longer the case. Go online, ask a question and we will announce 175000 pages of
answers. Radio and TV channels give you the news in real time 24 hours a day. Information travels at the speed of light ... Yes, but what information? The one who defends right or the one who defends face? Because it seems to be strongly oriented, not to say manipulated in certain cases. The mainstream media (independent? Hmm, hum - "pardon j'métouffe") spilled the authorities' version, using the controversy only to drive the point home of the politico-commercially correct, while on the internet developed the controversy going so far as to denounce an eradication strategy for half of the earth's population.

So, to which saint to devote yourself? Because of course each camp has its specialists, its historical, scientific references, its irrefutable proof. And then here in another area, that of global warming, explodes a bomb.

Hackers have entered the computers of the Climate Research Unit (CRU - This is the scientific laboratory that supplies the IPCC with data analysis - the IPCC is the international grouping which brings together 2500 scientists from around the world under the aegis of the UN around the climate issue) .These hackers have recovered thousands of thousands of
files and emails containing the private exchanges of the group of scientists. Why did they do this? Because the CRU systematically refuses to transmit the data on which it bases its analyzes and reports to other scientific teams. However in these emails, CRU scientists reveal many contradictions concerning recent data which would invalidate the theory of global warming caused by human activity. The Director of
CRU, Prof. Phil Jones, confirms that the files did come out of the CRU but he downplays information that "out of context, would not really mean what is written. Many others
eminent scientists are starting to talk about CLIMATE GATE. Then we learn that Professor Phil Jones would be suspended from his activities so as not to interfere with the course of the security investigation. Finally, it appears that all the files from which the CRU calculated the global warming curves for the IPCC have been destroyed. What credibility can you give to reports whose
basic data no longer exist? Not very professional as a scientific approach ... And while the "Climate Gate" smokes the computers of Internet users, the silence of the media and
journalists is remarkable; they cover the CRU ... "nothing serious" ...

In these two cases, the difference between what is conveyed on the media (radio, TV, press) and that which circulates on the Internet is striking. Who to believe: heads or tails? This story of warming
would it be only a fantastic manipulation to force people to accept constraints, taxes, controls, restrictions of liberties with the sole aim of strengthening the domination and the fortune of those who already have it? Is it just a news story brought to light by some scandal lovers or by some fundamentalist of non-human responsibility in the
climate change phenomenon? So, Flu or not flu? Danger or harmlessness of the vaccine? Global warming or not? Human responsibility or not? One thing seems clear to me. Wherever it comes from, the information is not objective. She knows how to take the form to better persuade, but this is only an illusion. What you want is the price of glory: its power, its omnipresence, its immediacy, the performance of communication techniques are such that it has become a strategic weapon in the service of underlying causes.
commercial or ideological. Should we be offended? Because if I want to be honest, I can only see that when I receive it, I tend to adopt a benevolent attitude to
with regard to the one who confirms my opinions while I rant in front of what comes to tickle them. How, under these conditions, can I expect society to provide me with information
pure while the one that I carry myself is tinted? Am i trying to harm Oh no, I want the greatest good for all; but to achieve this I rely on my convictions,
my beliefs, my knowledge, my experiences ... Add to that a dose of necessity for obligation to have to earn a living (and therefore some interests to defend), and here are the circuits of my
thoughts that naturally break out in some places while in others they get stronger. I do like everyone, what ... And the world offers me a caricature of what is happening in me.
Are we therefore condemned to choose as best we can between heads or tails and fight to make the side that we have adopted triumph? Imagine for a moment that this is possible. I take my
piece, a file, and I rub vigorously until the other side no longer exists ... I'm almost there ... look, more than the thickness of a cigarette sheet. One or two more shots and ...
Thanks! Nothing. The other side has disappeared, but so has mine. Absurd? Yes, but it's the game we play all the time. The duality that operates in us leads us to believe that the
happiness to which we all aspire so strongly is only possible when the good side (ours of course) has triumphed over the bad. But what does happiness mean? Wouldn't this be the state I would feel if I was no longer torn between heads or tails? If heads and tails were confused? And if duality only existed to bring us back to unity, where heads and tails are one. There, I will perhaps make laugh more than one of you: My conviction (but it is only my conviction ... therefore tinted ...) tells me that unity is our deep nature. The one to which we give the name of happiness, or more precisely of love. No! Not conditional love (I love you because you meet the criteria of what is lovable on the side of my room) I am talking about unconditional love, the one that makes me capable of welcoming difference.

Nonsense that all this! How would it be possible to love murder, theft, violence, hatred ... No, I'm not talking about loving the act, but the being who commits it. One who, so far removed from his deep nature by the twists and turns of life, expresses everything except love.
Well! Maybe I'm the one who's cracked. But one thing strikes me. Humanity has been exploring since the dawn of time the struggle of good against evil in the name of God first, of good, of freedom, of
justice, come on! ... Let's be "trendy", let's say in the name of "republican values". And we are still fighting, pointing on each side "the axis of evil". Our planet Earth by dint of
lime blows on both sides become thick like a cigarette sheet. Tell me, is it smart to continue? Malraux said that "the XXI ° century would be spiritual or would not be". I believe him; but beware; spiritual does not mean religious. No more struggle between heads or tails but quest for the point where heads and tails come together, can marry, blend. Me, this is the track that I want to explore. There is no risk since in any case the "traditional" way is more than blocked. Only here, when I see myself reacting to the information conveyed by the other side of the room, I tell myself that I have work to do before reaching the point of non-duality. Too bad, it will ask what it will ask but I think it's worth it. So whichever side of the room you feel good, I hope that this year will give you the opportunity to bury the hatchet and help you grow in your intelligence of heart, the one that can tell you that the truth is neither on the pile nor on the face ... and who knows ... will you feel your heart invaded by an unknown peace, a new compassion where the brambles which still line your path and claw you will change into clumps flowers.

Philippe Derudder

.Pdf version

[Capt_Maloche]

In fact I take this opportunity to place all my wishes of good health and clairvoyance for ... all of humanity


"Philippe Derudder", Well here is a man I would like to meet http://www.fondationdiagonale.org/spip.php?article44

Excerpts

... Can we really believe that the storm has passed and that everything will "become as before" with a layer of "green growth"?
...

Can we talk about recovery without blushing when we know that only the speculative economy has rebounded thanks to public funds while unemployment, private and corporate bankruptcies, defaults are increasing?

...
Can we be optimistic about a global elite
whose main action is to mask people with jets of perlimpinpin powder its
only concern to save the system and the dominant interests which it nourishes?

...
Finally, it appears that all the files from which the CRU calculated the global warming curves for the IPCC have been destroyed. What credibility can you give to reports whose basic data no longer exist? Not very professional as a scientific approach ...
And while the “Climate Gate” makes internet users' computers smoke, the silence of the media and journalists is remarkable; they cover the CRU ... "nothing serious" ...

...
One thing seems clear to me. Wherever it comes from, the information is not objective. She knows how to take the form to better persuade, but this is only an illusion.

...
Malraux said that "the XXI ° century would be spiritual or would not be". I believe him; but beware; spiritual does not mean religious.

I like this guy, he puts in order with clarity a number of subjects that concern me, you too probably

to place in the PBS

[Christophe]

"Philippe Derudder", Well here is a man I would like to meet http://www.fondationdiagonale.org/spip.php?article44

Well, that could be done, I had met him in 2002 during a meeting, we had discussed a lot and I personally exchange a few emails with him 1 or 2 times a year.

I think he must do some conferences on Paris from time to time ... so watch out!