econology Association: goals, means and functioning

[Flytox]

With regard to COM.

To do in the useful, it is necessary to pass the message:

"Insulate better, Ride less" is much more efficient than all of the scoops we were given in the pasture type energy saving lamps etc ...

http://www.manicore.com/documentation/economies.html

Everyone can set an annual goal, for example (Go from 15 cm of roof insulation to 30 cm and reduce the distance traveled by car by 20 or 30%.)

It is effective, tenable, depreciable and without being Arakiri
A+

[dekerle]

Is there a workshop looking for depollution of gases emitted by factories thanks to algae?

[Christophe]

To do in the useful, it is necessary to pass the message:

"Insulate better, Ride less" is much more efficient than all of the scoops we were given in the pasture type energy saving lamps etc ...

http://www.manicore.com/documentation/economies.html

Agree for the message (we could say heat less strongly too) but not for the so-called scoops because since we installed our ecowatt I found that the lighting was much more than what I thought in consumption and we are 100% in fluorescent ... We are more than 5% ... at least right now ...

I therefore disagree with Janco's figures on lighting ... and using fluorescent bulbs is not a measure ... it is a measure among others ... and it is surely one of the easier to set up. But yes it is largely insufficient!

dekerle : yes if you put it in place

[Flytox]

Indeed, everything is good to take and added in a good way! But, it was in the sense of saying that we could attack energy savings, pollution, double digits ..... the first year at least After that it will be a little more complicated without being utopian to make such a big gain without challenging deeper and thoughtful causes.

[dekerle]

oki! when can we meet?

[Christophe]

Well at the 1st general assembly for example ...

You can already send your subscription, indications and explanations in the 1st message.

[Did67]

I therefore disagree with Janco's figures on lighting ... and using fluorescent bulbs is not a measure ... it is a measure among others ... and it is surely one of the easier to set up. But yes it is largely insufficient!

: Cheesy:

Janco is a polytechnician ... He works in the calculation of large flows ...

I think you should always consider several points together:

- how much does it cost ? and does it pay off?

In short is it economically viable. Ex: compact fluorescent = yes

- is this "generalizable" (to a graded number, to everyone in rich countries? to everyone on this planet?)

Ex: flucocompacte: where there is electricity; in low voltage (PV) prefer LED ...

- is this sociologically acceptable?

Fluocmpacte: yes (but dry toilets, it gets stuck!) ...

- what imprint? Gray energy? Materials ? Heavy metals ? Recycling ???

I think that such an analysis "grid" is terribly lacking, when I see how we gut on the forums on this or that gadget (eg: compact fluorescent)!

[Christophe]

I think that such an analysis "grid" is terribly lacking, when I see how we gut on the forums on this or that gadget (eg: compact fluorescent)!

Good idea to think about a "multi-criteria grid" in one of the association's projects for example ...

But I am almost certain that it already exists in a very complete way (Life Cycle Analysis methods for example ...) ... but may not be accessible to the general public ...

[Michel Kieffer]

"Econology Association"

You can consider me as a new member for the commitment and for the actions, oh how useful and necessary, that you propose to take.

Good wishes to all for the success of your projects in 2010!

Michel

[Christophe]

Thank you Michel, I knew we could count on your support!

Otherwise functional side, ay, the bank account is created, I will have the Iban in the coming days.

Belgian friends, you can start to set aside and heat the pcbanking