Christophe wrote:
These drill could very well become arable land ... or vice versa, these forests have very well been replaced years ago farmland... I'm sure it exists even if it's more the opposite happens generally ...
Not always !
In the Middle Ages, much of France was forested. Then came the monks pioneers, the increase in population, etc ... The forest has declined in favor of cultures ... It was a real massacre. Fortunately, there were no environmentalists at the time, otherwise, there would have had battles to fight! It looks fine to criticize Brazil or Indonesia today! The residual forest as it remained in the late 19ème was either strategic value (oak forest for the Navy, wood for the railroad, a few industries: mining, glassworks ...) or the valuation of 'hardly cultivable areas; poor land, sloping land, wetlands, etc ... Today, the vast majority of the French forest occupies hardly cultivable areas or erosion threatening or very little fertile ...
Christophe wrote:I also recalled an undeniable fact: the PROGRESS forest in France ... so if it's for energy use, better Miscanthus as wood ...
For the progression of the forest, this is absolutely correct. The least profitable areas in "conventional agriculture" (mechanized, fertilized, etc.) are abandoned and are reforested - often it is moreover more scrub or forests of little value (birch , etc ...) ... Before globalization, there was thus after the war "francization" (each prdouction where it is most profitable), followed by "Europeanization" (fruit from Spain, wheat French, Dutch and Danish milk, etc ...)
I fear that for reasons of mechanization, miscanthus being grown primarily in lieu of traditional cultures - and not in the most difficult areas of mountain, where mechanization is difficult (or expensive - cf Switzerland) and where Brousaille wins ... Just a matter of cost of production!
But I repeat: in the future, there will be no simple solutions. It will probably not one ou the other, but both: mountain forest or on steep slopes, rocky terrain; Miscanthus plain ... Needless to fight for one against the other: it is both my general, each where it is relevant.
So no, it is "no better miscanthus than wood": it depends!