I never said that doing bio fuel to run at 5,75% was a good idea!
We agree
For fallows, they can be useful for land renewal.
I think it would be much better to move towards cultural techniques like TCS or seedlings under cover (Biomax, etc ...)
In addition, you should know that in France, if you wanted to switch to 100% bio fuel, agricultural areas including fallow land would be just enough. But it would require to go for food elsewhere, or tighten your belt!
At the same speech, there will never be enough, so there is no need to do it. I consider that HVB can be a niche fuel for the agricultural sector, or even for road transport. Not so long ago 10 at 15% of farm production was intended for the feeding of draft animals (horses, oxen). Agriculture is not at the grassroots of the citizens, if the demand for non-food outlets grows, farmers will respond (we join your speech on EGR valves wasteful because buyers do not want to pay them)
For HVB dilution in engine oil, please inquire about FUCHS Plantomot 5W40 or PANOLIN Biomot 5W40. Learn also about the nanofiltration of engine oil (KLEENOIL for example).
While you are there, learn about the work of Elsbett, VWP, ...
To be as categorical as you are, it would be necessary to know a little more the subject seems to me it.
Your ignorance of the work done on the HVB Beyond Rhine is uplifting (even appalling).
I do not have a pb with that either, but when you roll to the HVB and you dilute your oil little by little, do you know for a moment what is your rate of dillution? Where are your lubricant qualities? NO! Whereas when you integrate a part voluntarily in the constitution of your oil, you do not have this problem.
Lost, we have to be wary of what we say about forums, the 2 oils mentioned are 100% synthetic, they are not made from vegetable oil. Inquire seriously, or refrain from answering (me that's what I'm trying to do).
I do not see what would be ridiculous to incorporate 5% of HVB in diesel by promoting a short circuit circuit.
Incorporate 5% of oil if it is to divide the drain intervals not 4 I'm not sure that the environment is found (especially when we see what is made of the most waste oil) cases ...)
Please provide a reliable source indicating that 4 should be divided by "intervals" emptying when using 5% HVB (It's all-out, engine oil analysis is supported)
It would be quite honest to me to say that reducing the combustion temperature by recycling exhaust gases, if it decreases Nox increases HC production and degrades the engine performance (light overconsumption).
The increase in HC is relatively negligible compared to the decrease in NOx. When the engine performance, you must know what you want to polish less or drive fast. Do not be fooled if no manufacturer, managed to do without EGR valve is that there is a reason!
You limit (once again) the limits of the possible to that of your knowledge.
PACCAR engines (mounted on PL DAF) meet Euro4 and Euro5 standards without EGR and FAP.
Not "touching my ball" in matters of depollution, you can certainly give me your opinion on the compatibility between HVB and post-treatment of Nox (Urea injection, AD-Blue), that interests me.
These devices are only equipped for the moment that the engines of trucks (bp setting T ° C, and engine load) but there are apparently also some problems with the FAP on VP.
The molecules created by combustion in HVB or GO are the same. the treatment is therefore identical. Only the processes of regeneration of Noxtrap are different because the HVB produce more and it is necessary to reign more often.
I'm talking about urea injection and you get your "science" out on the Nox Traps .
cordially