Did67 wrote:indy49 wrote:Well, she 5,5 ... You "less than 5", I imagine 4,9?
Me 4.8l / 100.
It 5.5 ok, but that's not what's most interesting: you have to compare it with what it would do with another car. Hence my comparison with the Audi which made exactly the same trips since it was carpooling.Did67 wrote:1) We definitely don't have the same values! (even if your "mini" at 10 l, that surprises me a bit, it must be a Cooper driven in the Fangio?)
It is not _ma_ mini, but that of friends.
It turns at more than 9l and when I see them, they don't seem to be driving roughly, but I'm not always with them.Did67 wrote:2) If on a thread where we talk about futuristic solutions (H² as fuel, I remind you), we can not criticize a "revolution" of 10 years ago ???
Since it's still revolutionary, I would appreciate a little restraint
No, but what bothers me is that many hit it when it is frankly not the worst car (except maybe the aesthetics )And I'm not criticizing your choice.Did67 wrote:To be honest, I wondered about the Prius a good half a dozen years ago. Before taking other paths: replace an oil-fired boiler with a pellet boiler and replace two old "turbodiesel" (over 400 km each) which were starting to smoke with a C000 on LPG and a C1 on LPG.
Everyone has their reasons / constraints / etc.Did67 wrote:But here, we are talking about "energy balance", not "what is the latest technology" in terms of cars ...
Dividing by 2 is not that bad
But again, I am not against future developments. And I would like to ride full-electric.