jonule wrote:well, you probably do not know the extent of my words, that must be why you judge me in this way, but this reasoning belongs to you you have the right, I just say it's a shame ...
I can only "apprehend you" by what I read here ... And I don't always like it, so I say it ...
jonule wrote:here we are not on olio, nor on my site, and i don't see what importance you are talking about, except the one you give them.
Gné?
jonule wrote:when you say "high percentage" you do not specify which one. there are DCi and DCi, when everyone has them then you'll see who will say "but why did we wait so long then?" ... it's a simple bet that only commits me, of course, but I'm not the only one that's all.
you do not specify moreover what are the "big concerns": me it is this easy comment that I judge, without any precisions it is you who remains generalist, with negative tendency.
dCi from Renault therefore, it is specified, their operation is not very different according to the models ... In this case, these are 1.9 models from 100 to 115 hp mounted on utility vehicles. Between 75% and 85% oil if I remember correctly. Rather serious supply problem: a priori there is a "gadget" which tells the computer that the fuel density is not good (and apparently, this is an important data when the fuel is compressed to such pressures! ) and it happens to put the motor completely in curtain, or to make it work in very degraded mode, without power, etc ...
I don't generalize anything : I'm just saying that several negative experiences, linked to the very concept of motors, impose precautions, and first of all verbal precautions, when we talk about this type of subject!
jonule wrote:when you are out of your apprehensions and you have moved on to the stage of practice, then you can judge.
I don't "judge" the technique!
I'm just saying it's stupid to always trumpet "
It's possible"without adding a minimum of warnings ...
The precautions are not for me, but more generally when we address other interlocutors. It is one of the biggest trap of the Web: we find everything and anything!
By default I consider that it is much more intelligent and constructive to warn people of potential difficulties, rather than to let them believe anything ...
The famous speech "Ne
don't worry, all is well, it works", it's more the prerogative of your AREVA friends, isn't it?
jonule wrote:for each application there are precautions to be taken that's all.
This is exactly what I am trying to make you understand: Thank you!
jonule wrote:lumberjack wrote:It is an observation very easy to make, it suffices to know how to read, listen, analyze and synthesize ...
ah I understand: you are a French "teacher" then?
Why?
It is necessary to be a "Teacher" to think that reasoning and intelligence are interesting in an exchange of ideas?