I gladly relay it and I am happy that they are talking about AGROfuels and not BIOfuels, thus only condemning 1st generation biofuels (that is to say biofuels made from food plants and which are now correctly named title AGROcarburants) and not the principle of biofuels as a whole (as many other media have already done!). For info, we proposed this distinction in December 2007 on Econologie.com! https://www.econologie.com/agrocarburant ... -3575.html
The campaign concerns and denounces especially:
a) the tension on food quotations (supposedly because of biofuels but we understood that it was mainly speculation)
b) the inadmissible coupling between certain agricultural products and oil prices! A bit like the price of firewood is coupled with the price of oil ...
I still didn't understand why, given the technical and cultural differences (no pun intended ... though) as much Mexican corn, as French wheat or Indian rice were all listed by Chicago traders...
Oxfam wrote:“The agrofuels, it doesn’t feed his world ”
At a time when negotiations are opening at European level on large-scale consumption of agrofuels, Oxfam France - Agir ici is launching, with the CCFD - Terre solidaire and Les Amis de la Terre, the campaign "Agrofuels, that not feed his world ”.
Carried out in partnership with Indonesian, Colombian, Beninese and Brazilian associations, the campaign opposes any quantified objective of incorporating agrofuels into the energy consumption of European transport by 2020.
The member associations of the campaign highlight the catastrophic impacts of large-scale development of agrofuels, at all levels: food, environmental and social. Disastrous effects which can only be mitigated by the revision of policies to support this market and not by an illusory certification or a future "second generation".
Indeed, presented as the miracle solution against the exhaustion of oil reserves but also as a remedy for global warming, agrofuels today threaten local populations and food crops by monopolizing the land and natural resources. They are also contributing to the global rise in food prices which has plunged almost 100 million more people into hunger and poverty and endangered the livelihoods of 300 million people. This figure, already intolerable, could double by 2025 if the current rush on agrofuels continues.
From a strictly environmental point of view, the massive development of agrofuels has serious ecological impacts on our planet, in the North as in the South: increase in chemical pollution, genetic risk or even depletion of biodiversity, soils and water reserves .
Don't hesitate to visit the campaign website www.agrocarb.fr
Web extension of the campaign, it contains a great deal of additional information (reports, additional file, mobilization document, etc.) and allows you to follow the latest news on agrofuels as closely as possible via a blog fed by the member associations of the campaign.
ps: the oil Laigret is it a biofuel in the strict sense according to you?