It's "normal", everyone defends their convictions with their differences (otherwise it becomes navel-gazing) and with passion.Janic wrote:
Obamot wrote:
What would be interesting would be YOUR opinion, rather.
It's already done, just reread everythingIt seems to me that there has not been a single time, where there has been a calm debate on this subject. Without the fuss and without a dogmatic approach. Not one ... While many agree on guidelines and points of convergence! So it's a shame, isn't it?
You had started a thread and I had already encouraged you, but in the end there had been nothing concrete, tangible, practical, no preamble, no plan, no priority ...
I remember this proposal that I did not follow because, despite appearances, I have not been promoting VG for decades, I just try to make connections when this subject is more or less raised. Afterwards, if people are interested, it's up to them to go into the subject in depth, I don't have to act as their guru.
In the same way, I am passionate about theology and each time it is necessary to explain that spirituality and religions are different things, even opposed in certain cases, and as I do not have the vocation to be a guru in this field. nor do I make it a specific subject.
I understand that by your attitude, you want the process to be "individual", which is very commendable and correct. But when the process already exists and there is "a demand", in this case it is necessary to respond to it ....
If people have had the curiosity to delve into the subject, I can compare my approach to theirs, but as an old friend said: “ To talk about mechanics, it is still necessary that the interlocutor has sufficient knowledge of it »
OR so you're trying to protect yourself, somewhere or something ... (but I don't really know.)
No, I'm so used to almost everything that can be or has been said on the subject, that I seem to hear a broken record every time, it's boring, that's all! (But even VGs also take over misconceptions, so !!!)
On the other hand, I do not understand that we can defend the pre-square of VG tooth and nail, and that when it is proposed to make a dedicated constructive thread, we discover resignation.
I am not defending the VG or rather the VGs, but the misconceptions on this subject. If people are interested in the subject, they don't need me given everything there is on the web.
But when I am on a VG site I do not speak more about ecology except when the same kind of ready-made ideas are evoked. Of the kind: " I do not understand the ecologists who eat meat knowing the impact of breeding on the planet And I don't make friends when I send their own attitude back to them by saying " I do not understand either that VG are not green ”And in the same way, I have never created a thread on ecology, others have more or less done it and I only intervene there occasionally.