Radioactive fertilizers?

Agriculture and soil. Pollution control, soil remediation, humus and new agricultural techniques.
User avatar
Gregconstruct
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 1781
Registration: 07/11/07, 19:55
Location: Amay Belgium




by Gregconstruct » 09/09/08, 19:22

jonule wrote:in short, fertilizers, tobacco, smoke, radionuclides, particles: we live because we breathe!
the lungs are filters, when they are clogged it hurts.


Just Auguste!
0 x
Every action counts for our planet !!!
User avatar
Woodcutter
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 4731
Registration: 07/11/05, 10:45
Location: Mountain ... (Trièves)
x 2




by Woodcutter » 09/09/08, 21:49

Christophe wrote:[...] because tobacco is as radioactive as a man ... it's ridiculous ...

This mailing is intoxicating ... all because people can't tell the difference between 1 and 1 ...
Reread the message of Bibiphoque just above yours and you will understand ... The radioactivity in the heart of the body can actually have effects.

jonule wrote:[...], and all the particles + fine that the micron pass directly into the blood ... they are vbroken down and accumulated like all heavy metals in the heart and brain. as soon as they are in the blood, they radiate everything around! [...]
Here ? Where does that come from?

jonule wrote:[...], understand ? that is to say that it necrosis, carcinogenesis, mutagenesis etc ... by force, several years later it is the declared cancer which metastasized where are the heavy metals ... and it is transmitted from generation to generation! what the hell is that ... birth defects? my eye.
What is this gibberish? What is passed down from generation to generation? : Shock:

Christophe wrote:
Gregconstruct wrote:I also smoke but I wouldn't have the nerve to complain about the blow of life if I spent such sums on something that is not a priority ...

You speak charles! Some smokers will dare to tell you in isolation and certainty that it is the fault of the cigarette sellers who incited them to smoke ... and to continue.

Has a murderer ever filed a complaint against the manufacturer of the weapon of his murder? I don't think ... well with tobacco it's the same ...
What does this have to do with arms manufacturers? : Shock: : Shock: : Shock:

You have often seen TV or cinema spots that show you scenes "in which you want to be" or that awaken in you the desire to escape (camping, nature, fireside, starry night, beautiful landscapes, to ride a horse, to live in the great outdoors, etc ...) and for which the link with the brand of weapon is made very explicitly? Do you often have weapon manufacturers sponsoring important sporting and televised events?
Sorry, I didn't know that Beretta was the first sponsor of Ferrari!

I'm not saying that we have to transfer everything to the manufacturers, but to deny the mental manipulation that they have exercised for decades on people is negationism ...


Gregconstruct wrote:
Leo Maximus wrote:It is true that a good Havana ... 8) But, hey, tobacco is useless if not to enrich profiteers.
if we follow this logic, we can take it for wine for example, or any pleasure product that is not essential to our survival! [...]
Except that the wine has still some beneficial effects, tobacco none!
0 x
"I am a big brute, but I rarely mistaken ..."
Bibiphoque
I posted 500 messages!
I posted 500 messages!
posts: 749
Registration: 31/03/04, 07:37
Location: Brussels




by Bibiphoque » 10/09/08, 08:47

Woodcutter wrote:Except that the wine has still some beneficial effects, tobacco none!

Hello,

There it is :

http://www.plantes-bienfaits.com/tabac.php

@+ : Mrgreen:
0 x
This is not because we always said that it is impossible that we should not try :)
jonule
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 2404
Registration: 15/03/05, 12:11




by jonule » 10/09/08, 09:05

to be more explicit Bucheron (yes I admit it is short cut but after they charge me for doing lengths ... ;-):

what you breathe passes in your blood! oxygen, and derivatives (tobacco, opium, ...): what is too large is filtered by the lungs, what is too fine passes directly into the blood!
therefore conveyed.
we can find a source I think; for that of the accumulation of heavy metals, it is known and established I thought, they accumulate in the body, because not intended to eliminate them, and the points are the brain, the heart, among others.
So why heavy metal you mean? well because everything that ends in "nium" for me is a heavy metal ... with lead and mercury.
polonium 210 on wiki:
Polonium (isotope 210) is a metal with a low melting temperature and relatively volatile: in fact, 50% of a given mass of this element evaporates in the air at 50⁰C in 45 hours.
It is an emitter of alpha radiation. 210Po has a half-life period of 138 days.
It is generated as a result of disintegrations which start from uranium 238, and pass inter alia by radium 226, radon 222 and lead 210 end in polonium 210 then end in stable lead 206.

so the history of NATURAL polonium from NATURALLY radioactive rocks makes me laugh! it is still a product from the chemical reprocessing industry that we are eaten, once +.

BUT GOOD has clearly marked "smoking kills": so we can no longer even sue ............................... .................................................. .................................................. ..........

after for what is transmitted from generation to generation: the irradiation of these particles produces a transmutation of DNA, which leads to cancer for example by metastases (which I suspect by accumulation of these filth precisely but it is a personal hypothesis ): if you look at alpha ray irradiation (very informative on the internet), you will see that this produces genetic mutations, which are transmissible, like all genetic heritage!
dogs do not cats.

hold interesting, effect of polonium 210 on health:
http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/sr-sr/finance/ts ... 66-fra.php

I let react ...
0 x
User avatar
bham
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 1666
Registration: 20/12/04, 17:36
x 6




by bham » 10/09/08, 09:59

jonule wrote: ... so the history of NATURAL polonium from NATURALLY radioactive rocks makes me laugh! it is still a product from the chemical reprocessing industry that we are eaten, once +.

hold interesting, effect of polonium 210 on health:
http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/sr-sr/finance/ts ... 66-fra.php

I let react ...


However, I dumble on the site that you found, it is written:
Polonium-210 and its precursor, lead-210, result from the radioactive decay of radon, a natural gas, in the atmosphere.

Radon is indeed a natural gas present in granite rocks in particular.
0 x
jonule
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 2404
Registration: 15/03/05, 12:11




by jonule » 10/09/08, 10:10

I didn't think it would take the bait so quickly! ....

yes, it is to show that we should not trust all scientific studies, especially those that say that GMOs are not dangerous in rats only after 3 weeks!

this teaches you to make your self-criticism: do you really believe that the polonium that killed the Russian spy is NATURALLY found in nature?


it's funny because it was you who compared before the ARTIFICIAL radioactivity of depleted uranium from waste electrical consumption with the NATURAL radioactivity of the soils of the Vosges ...

but did you only look for "alpha irradiation" on google?

you will see how the industry takes us for guinea pigs ...
http://www.google.fr/search?client=fire ... che+Google
0 x
Leo Maximus
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 2183
Registration: 07/11/06, 13:18
x 124




by Leo Maximus » 10/09/08, 11:11

The graph on the next page shows the decay chain for uranium as it occurs in nature:

http://www.ccnr.org/decay_U238_f.html

Polonium is not detectable by a Geiger counter because the tube of this one is not sensitive to alpha particles but it is indirectly detectable by the fact that there are gamma emitters in the chain, in particular Radium powerful gamma emitter, used elsewhere as a source in radiography at the beginning of the XNUMXth century. : Shock:

NB: I have a small collection of uranium ore at home, Autunite, Betafite, Pechblende, Uraninite, and others ... so I also have Polonium 210. : Lol:
0 x
User avatar
Gregconstruct
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 1781
Registration: 07/11/07, 19:55
Location: Amay Belgium




by Gregconstruct » 10/09/08, 11:14

Leo Maximus wrote:NB: I have a small collection of uranium ore at home, Autunite, Betafite, Pechblende, Uraninite, and others ... so I also have Polonium 210. : Lol:


Are you fluorescent at night?
0 x
Every action counts for our planet !!!
User avatar
bham
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 1666
Registration: 20/12/04, 17:36
x 6




by bham » 10/09/08, 11:16

jonule wrote: this teaches you to make your self-criticism: do you really believe that the polonium that killed the Russian spy is NATURALLY found in nature?

Don't know.
jonule wrote: it's funny because it was you who compared before the ARTIFICIAL radioactivity of depleted uranium from waste electrical consumption with the NATURAL radioactivity of the soils of the Vosges ...

You must confuse daffodil, I never talked about that.

jonule wrote:you will see how the industry takes us for guinea pigs ...
http://www.google.fr/search?client=fire ... che+Google

You know jonule, I know radon to be native to a region in which there is naturally; now it is possible that what they say on your site is false, I was only seeing it; of course we have to be careful about our readings, of course we have to be critical, now if the polonium 210 does not come from the decay of radon, find us an article that proves the opposite.
0 x
Bibiphoque
I posted 500 messages!
I posted 500 messages!
posts: 749
Registration: 31/03/04, 07:37
Location: Brussels




by Bibiphoque » 10/09/08, 11:51

Leo Maximus wrote:The graph on the next page shows the decay chain for uranium as it occurs in nature:

http://www.ccnr.org/decay_U238_f.html

Polonium cannot be detected by a Geiger counter because its tube is not sensitive to alpha particles

: Lol:


Hello,
If, it is detectable, if it is a meter with window of mica.
@+
0 x
This is not because we always said that it is impossible that we should not try :)

 


  • Similar topics
    Replies
    views
    Last message

Back to "Agriculture: problems and pollution, new techniques and solutions"

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 335 guests