Obamot wrote:Did67 wrote:
There can be no sociological feasibility, since we know that "Sociology is the branch of the human sciences that studies and observes the way humans think and behave in society, to try to understand and explain them".
I specify my thought:
a) there is a whole set of "technical" problems in the development of EVs: producing electricity, solving the problem of storage, autonomy, the availability of lithium, its polluting extraction, etc ... etc .. .
b) I just wanted to say, thatmore, development will be better if we take into account our behavior (it's sociology, right ???).
So if the model is technically perfect (I don't know which one, but let's admit), but it doesn't adapt to our behavior, it will be a failure.
In, the occurrence I responded to the proposal for a fully shared universal fleet. We arrive at the station, we leave the car we were using and we leave with another car ...
Technically, remundo is right, it would be simpler than changing the batteries.
But from the point of view of our behavior (appropriation of material goods; mistreatment of common goods), I doubt that it is feasible!
I called it "sociological feasibility". I'm not sure it doesn't make sense. But let's admit!
I propose to start by installing a washing machine per building, rather than multiplying them! And we take stock in a year!
[this is a real experience, in which I participated over 40 years ago, in a boarding school! There was the movement of community houses ... Communities ... The results seem to me to say the least, very very reserved ...]