sen no sen
Janic wrote:
It is especially to take them for idiots to make them believe that they have a pathology that does not exist!
I summarize:
So we touch the bottom of the problem: AIDS does not exist.
Stop doing the donkey to get some sound. Deficient immune systems are messy, but they are not referred to as HIV-related AIDS, they are IDs only.
At the beginning we talk about the negation of causality between HIV / AIDS, now it's more direct, AIDS is an invention of the pharmaceutical laboratory to sell medicines, it's a conspiracy and a global conspiracy ... sum the AIDS is only the consequence of a bad hygiene of life, it is very strong!
Whatever ! You put up your cinema by ignoring everything that has been said and written since the beginning of the controversy; but if it makes you take your foot with that: good pleasure!
It would be good for you to expose your point of view directly, rather than to hear it by taking a step forward and two steps back.
And you go round in circles! You focus on particular points so as not to respond to other fundamentals.
Then it's not
MON point of view, but that of very high-level scientists who have taken a stand!
Quote:
People who are diagnosed with AIDS experience intense stress and their fear of panic makes them accept any prescription from their usual doctor, which is itself conditioned by the ad made to the subject. So turning to complements goes through a challenge to the system for its inefficiency and it works, but it is rare that people are subjected to the politically / medially correct. Read the testimonies lived ...
This point of view is very fragmentary and very Western.
The simple nocebo effect can not cause the death of a person via a particular type of pathology.
No, but intoxication by poisons like AZT and its successors: yes! So you still do not want to read the lived testimonials!
The psychology of each is different, the evils that can result from a traumatic announcement can be very diverse depending on the individual, so it can not explain the convergence of pathological effect related to this disease
We do not all somatize the same way ... because we do not all have the same lives ...
That's counter psychology!
Poisoning, he, somatizes everyone; so stress + poisoning, the chances of getting away are slim, even nil.
Quote:
But medicine is not limited to this aspect, other equally effective therapies, or even more, exist and freedom of conscience can not limit individuals to submit to the big pharma lobbies.
Example of Switzerland who is both a great seller of medicines and a great user of healers ...
It shows that Pasteur is not their national glory and that they are open to what can relieve or cure the sick. Our school medicine subsidized by big pharma's lobbies should take some seed
Quote:
Basically, that's good on the condition of not being mistaken on its meaning. If a person smokes and makes lung cancer, mouth, bladder, etc ... it is not the fault of the neighbor. Alcohol alike. The drugs too. Diabetes, cholesterol and others are not the others who are the cause. So everyone is responsible for their actions and lifestyle choices!
You have the gifts to say evidences!
You have the gift to ask useless questions when the answer goes without saying.
Your point of view, however, reflects a total simplism, you believe that the only lifestyle would ensure good health?
So try to hold a stool on one foot!
Just push it into the ground! A stupid question silly answer. This aspect has already been seen and reviewed, but as you deny the third foot, you are no more advanced with two feet only.
It's still a very western point of view.
Health is not only a matter of lifestyle, but of mental, of relationship to society, environment, genetics, epigenetics and statistics!
This is going to tell a cancer patient at the end of life that it is only a question of statistics, of epigenetics, with that it will certainly heal! Or that it is the announcement of his death assured.
Many survivors from death camps or conflict camps have survived - and very old - despite horrible living conditions.
This shows that the human machine was indeed created to withstand extreme conditions, but the number who left their lives there is much more numerous and & with a little healthy food and adequate living conditions, most would have stayed in. life. You could even add that cancers were almost unknown there as what living in a concentration camp would avoid cancer. Hello three ball logic!
By cons I know athletes, no smoking, eating organic who died in a short time, without the medicine can explain their disappearance via any causal link.
DES? And yet there is inevitably one such as being late to a lifestyle that can not compensate for the past, do not dream! I have also known some of the last days of resistance who would like to have butter and buttery money.
If the hygiene of life is the basic condition for good health, it can not be considered as solution to all the problems, because many of them are original rather obscure.
Who said it was the solution to ALL the problems? You! If it solved even half by preserving the immune system of the many attacks that we, and the modern system, make it suffer, it would not be bad!
I have already mentioned the case of a child asphyxiated at birth and which marked a huge growth retardation, because, and 8 years she still did not walk, despite toubib, kines and others, did not speak, did regular crises of convulsions. In less than a year, starting from advice of hygiene of life, she began to walk, to talk to the great surprise of the doctor, the Physiotherapist, the family. The thing was all the more difficult if the father was in favor, the mother was opposed in principle and it was a game of cat and mouse. But the girl's rapid progress was such and so rapid that she gradually rallied to it, which further accelerated the "resurrection" of their child.
And this is just one example among others lived personally or by testimonials.
What differentiates us is that you are in a school speech and I (and others) in the reality of the lived experience.
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
