The century-old mystery. How to live longer?

How to stay healthy and prevent risks and consequences on your health and public health. occupational disease, industrial risks (asbestos, air pollution, electromagnetic waves ...), company risk (workplace stress, overuse of drugs ...) and individual (tobacco, alcohol ...).
User avatar
Capt_Maloche
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 4559
Registration: 29/07/06, 11:14
Location: Ile-de-France
x 42




by Capt_Maloche » 28/09/12, 22:22

I saw this guy on the news, no excess he said, and regular physical training; point bar

to that I think we have to add healthy food, good sleep, and healthy air

the rest is a matter of state of mind

Ah yes, and I was going to forget, to motivate myself regularly Image it's good for the heart :D
0 x
"Consumption is similar to a search consolation, a way to fill a growing existential void. With, the key, a lot of frustration and a little guilt, increasing the environmental awareness." (Gérard Mermet)
OUCH, OUILLE, OUCH, AAHH! ^ _ ^
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79372
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 11063




by Christophe » 02/03/13, 20:37

A study that contradicts all that has been said above ...
: Shock: : Shock: : Shock: : Shock:

http://fr.news.yahoo.com/cest-prouv%C3% ... 46338.html

According to a German study, people who are blinded by their negative thoughts and fear of the future are more likely to live long.

Here is a news which should rejoice the most indecrottable defeatists. Older people who are pessimistic about their prospects for future happiness live longer and healthier than those who are optimistic, according to a German study. "The elderly who expect a limited degree of satisfaction with their personal situation in the future obviously live longer and in better health than the elderly who imagine a rosy future", writes the institute. German economy DIW, citing an academic study.

Researchers at Friedrich-Alexander University in Nuremberg used data from the German Socio-Economic Panel, a large-scale multidisciplinary study (30 people) conducted since 000. They studied the responses given each year between 1984 and 1993 by those surveyed on their current level of satisfaction and their estimate over a five-year horizon. They then checked whether these expectations had been met or not.

Result: 43% of the oldest respondents were too pessimistic, 25% were right and 32% were too optimistic. Importantly, the study showed that, in the latter group, the risk of degradation of physical capacities was higher and the risk of dying was 10% higher, in the most optimistic people. “Being more pessimistic about one's future is likely to make older people take more care of their health and be more cautious of danger,” suggests Frieder Lang, director of the Institute of Gerontological Psychology of the University of Nuremberg.
0 x
User avatar
sen-no-sen
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6856
Registration: 11/06/09, 13:08
Location: High Beaujolais.
x 749




by sen-no-sen » 02/03/13, 20:41

So with the crisis we will all live beyond 120 years! : Lol:

It is funded by whom is this study, MEDEF? : Mrgreen:
0 x
"Engineering is sometimes about knowing when to stop" Charles De Gaulle.
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538




by Obamot » 02/03/13, 21:25

Isn't there something to do culturally, there?

By way of example, by enlarging the line a little: it would not be among the Judeo-Christians and in particular among the Protestants that he would be experienced as "carefully"to hurt yourself and"times"to do yourself good ...? : Cheesy:

And then the pessimists, being more anxious, they are necessarily more careful, right?

Having studied managerial techniques (it was in the course program). It may surprise you to know that in Southeast Asia, the statistics are diametrically opposed.
0 x
User avatar
gegyx
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6991
Registration: 21/01/05, 11:59
x 2914




by gegyx » 02/03/13, 21:47

Hello
I came across a story by Maitreya that would give a simple recipe for fighting cancer cells.

SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 11, 2012

I Am The Maitreya, I Will Teach You How to Cure Cancer ..

Here I want to teach you how to cure cancer. It is not by prayer or by any holistic methods which are perfectly fine if everyone can be healed by such methods. Instead, I present a complete scientific method that anyone can be benefited by learning from it.

Trojan Horse Protocol

1. Theory

Refined carbohydrates digest so quickly that they act like sugar, and cancer cells love sugar. They have about 15 times more receptor cells for capturing sugar than the normal cells. This means that in the presence of the abundant sugar, cancer cells can grow 15 times faster than the normal cells. The following is the molecular structure of a single sugar molecule. Notice that there are two ring structures consisting of glucose and fructose in a single sugar molecule.

Image

Now it is reminded that the above sugar molecule is recognized by the cancer cells as nutrition to digest and consume it 15 times more than the normal cells do. We are trying to use this property of the cancer cell's digestive mechanism to attack the cancer cells themselves. After all, cancer cells are organic material that replicates itself according to the genetic instructions imprinted in the DNA. The general consensus on cancer treatment has almost come to the point that it will evade every possible method of treatment as if the cancer cells themselves have highly evolved brain functions. Of course, this can hardly be the truth.

Cancer cells are just following the living organism's predictable way of replication.

This is the fundamental philosophical starting point of the Trojan Horse protocol.

Therefore, we believe that there must be a “well defined way” to stop the replication and eventually eliminate the cancer cells in the body because nothing can surpass our human brain.

The reason we call this method a “Trojan Horse Protocol” is because we give the cancer cells their irresistible appetite craving for, but, on the other hand, we give them something else attached to it slightly disguised like the soldiers inside the marvelous wooden horse .

We have to use the atomic elements that are very close to hydrogen (atoms in the first row of the periodic table) yet become toxic when consumed by the living organism. The suitable candidate for these elements can be either Na (sodium) or K (potassium). In fact, both of these chemicals are fundamental nutrition that the body needs. While potassium and sodium themselves in quantities are not toxic to the body, their hydroxide forms have the caustic effect in such a way that they wash off the grease, fat and other organic materials in the presence with a lot of water.

If we can attach a few NaOH (sodium hydroxide) or KOH (potassium hydroxide) atoms to the hydrogen and oxygen end of the sugar molecules, as a byproduct of digestion by the cancer sells, NaOH molecule will be produced inside the cancer cell. As we know, this NaOH molecule is a strong detergent that washes off grease and dirt when water is supplied with it. Effectively, the digestive byproduct of Na atoms attached to sugar dissolves the cancer cells by making them washable substances. We will present the detailed method to make a safe level of NaOH attached sugar molecule by the method of boiling in the solution.

Here, instead of using the concept of killing the cancer cells, we prefer to use the term washing off because it is much more appropriate in terms of the biological processes happening inside the cells. Of course, washing off cannot happen without first detaching the cancer cells from the other healthy part of the body. But it looks like the both process happens almost simultaneously.

The key advantage of this protocol is in the fact that the slightly modified sugar is used for food for the cancer cells and the digestive process eventually kills and washes off the dead cancer cells from the body. Therefore it is self explanatory to call this method “Trojan Horse Protocol”.

In this protocol, cancer cells are 15 times more chance to be killed by the slightly modified sugar than the normal cells. This means that this protocol can cause minimal damage to the healthy cells if any. In fact Na atom is in the same family of the periodic table as hydrogen so the Na atom attached sugar molecule doesn't have to be seen radically different from the molecular view point of the cancer cells so that the cancer cells readily absorb the NaOH attached sugar molecules without rejection which ultimately cause the destruction of the cancer cell itself. Normal cells are constantly regenerated by the natural body growth functions so that even if some of the normal cells maybe killed by this modified sugar molecules, the overall regeneration mechanism will supplement the loss. On the other hand, this may enhance the cleaning up process of the dead cells and the refreshment of the inside body with the new cells.

The tested effect was dramatic. In three days after consuming the liquid form of the dissolved water modified sugar molecule drink in 6 ounce of glass for three times, most of the metastases symptoms of the lung cancer have disappeared.

There was no visible side effect observed in the healing process.


2. How to prepare the medicine

A: two tea spoons of baking soda

B: two tea spoons of maple syrup

C: 1 and 5/8 cups of distilled water

Add and mix A, B, C well and put it into a small pot that can fill half of the mixed liquid.

Boil the liquid in the pot for 15 to 18 minutes. Watch the color of the liquid turns into a yellowish tint. Once the volume of the liquid drops to 70 percent of the original volume, as a result of the evaporation, the medicine can be considered done. Now add the clean water to fill up to the original level of the mixed liquid. The taste of the liquid is very important. If the liquid tastes like sugary water mixed with baking soda, it is not done yet. It needs more boiling. If the liquid tastes extremely bitter, you have over done it. It has to be somewhere in between extreme bitter and sweet taste to be a perfect medicine. What happens in the boiling process is that the baking soda NaHCO3 loses carbon dioxide (CO2) and leaves NaOH. The bubble that is coming out of the liquid is mostly the carbon dioxide and the water vapor.

As mentioned previously, this partially created NaOH ionic molecules are attached to the hydro oxide and hydro carbon tentacles of the sugar molecules and become the weapons of the warriors in the Trojan battle against the cancer cells. The reason for “partially” created NaOH ionic molecule is because the number of NaOH ionic molecules created in the boiling process depends on how long the boiling process has lasted. The more presence of NaOH ionic molecule in the solution results in the more bitter taste of the liquid.

Since the cancer cell has to be disappointed that they are ingesting sugar molecules, slightly sweet taste of the liquid is OK, but if the taste of the liquid is too bitter, the cancer cells may reject ingesting it realizing that it is not sugar molecule anymore after the too many attachment of NaOH in the sugar molecule in such a way that the basic structure of the sugar molecule is fundamentally changed so that the cancer cells perceive they are not sugar molecules any longer. Although this is purely a biochemical process, the basic idea is that the receptor of the sugar molecule in the cancer cells may be able to distinguish between the real and the heavily modified sugar molecules, which will essentially make the protocol ineffective.

Drink the one full glass of the prepared liquid, after it cooled down to a warm level, slowly like sipping. It is advised that at least one hour after the meal would be ideal time to take the liquid medicine.

You can supplement vitamin C, vitamin B12, Calcium, 200 mg of Niacin for added energy and immune system boost.

The result is very dramatic. In three days, you will regain the appetite and experience the disappearance of the most of the discomfort in the body, etc. However, it is reminded that it takes at least a couple of month to completely free of the remaining symptoms. It is very easy to discontinue the use of the medicine in a week because of the dramatic improvement of the body condition and also because you don't feel any more discomfort. But it is very important that you still have to continue taking the medicine at least additional two months and more to completely remove the trace of the cancer cells in the body. Remember it took a long time to develop a cancer in your body in the first place and it will take as long time to get rid of it.

This protocol is also effective in getting rid of all kinds of micro parasites that steals nutrition from your body because they will end up saturated with Sodium Hydroxide which is a deadly toxin for those microbes. It will simply help dissolve and wash them away in the liquefied form out of the body, like the grease and dirt in the clothes out of the washing machine, of course, that includes the cancer cells. The greatest advantage of this Trojan horse protocol is that the protocol is more effective if the harmful parasites have stronger appetite for sugar in the body than the normal cells. It is truly the deadly death trap for the cancer cells and other harmful parasites in the body.

This limits the damage to the normal cells to the minimum and helps regain the bodily health. In the recovery process, it is important to take a lot of protein instead of the hydro carbide that turns into sugar. It is recommended that drinking at least a half gallon of lactose free milk a day will be very helpful to recover the health. It doesn't have to be lactose free, but, in general, lactose free milk is more easily digestible. Instead of drinking water, try to develop the habit of drinking the lactose free milk to quench the thirst and that will help enhance the recovery very fast. The reason for this because the normal cells and the cancer cells get the equal amount of protein based nutrition. This way, there is less chance of inflamed growth of the cancer cells and their developing into metastasis.


No need to chat about Maitreya, I know the rest ... : Cheesy:
0 x
Janic
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 19224
Registration: 29/10/10, 13:27
Location: bourgogne
x 3491




by Janic » 03/03/13, 08:38

Hello
I came across a story by Maitreya that would give a simple recipe for fighting cancer cells.
the use of baking soda is not new and appears to be particularly effective temporarily. When sugar is not new either but the article does not specify which sugar it is, that is to say refined sugar, this beautiful industrial white sugar so refined that it decalcifies, among other things, and especially abundantly nourishes cancer cells. The same experiment showed that unrefined cane sugar did not have the same effect and the cancer cell did not eat it.
Increase in sugar consumption + meat consumption = dizzying increase in cancers.
0 x
User avatar
gegyx
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6991
Registration: 21/01/05, 11:59
x 2914




by gegyx » 03/03/13, 10:17

It is specified however in the text:

two teaspoons of maple syrup
0 x
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538




by Obamot » 03/03/13, 10:36

However? Anyway it doesn't change anything! And it's not guaranteed (it depends on the stage at which the cancer is). Chemistry also makes it possible to stop degenerative diseases and / or viruses for a while and in some cases (Tamiflu, tri-therapy, vaccines, etc.)

The most difficult thing with cancer is to heal without remission.

So there is no mystery: as Janic says, it is only temporary (in the best case) it is better to treat "the ground" first.

Because launching into this type of "recipe" without doing it first is to play Russian roulette. Since the body then always remains in a latent state:
"Saturation of the organism => pre-cancerous state"

It's a bit like leaving a lioness in a cage in your apartment with her cubs without feeding her, and leaving the door of the enclosure wide open ...
0 x
Janic
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 19224
Registration: 29/10/10, 13:27
Location: bourgogne
x 3491




by Janic » 03/03/13, 12:45

hello gegix
It is specified however in the text:
Quote:
two teaspoons of maple syrup

You're right, I went too fast, I wanted to talk about the sugar that nourishes cancer and indicated in the article.
obamot wrote:However? Anyway it doesn't change anything! And it's not guaranteed (it depends on the stage at which the cancer is).
Not quite ; it is not the stage of cancer which is decisive, but the remaining vitality (roughly the charge of the human battery and not its mechanical state) in the patient.
Chemistry also makes it possible to stop degenerative diseases and / or viruses for a while and in some cases (Tamiflu, tri-therapy, vaccines, etc.)

Ooh La La ! not these examples there: the tramiflu was used for lack of better, without knowing if it would be effective and it made irreversible damage on the true or false AIDS patients. Vaccines are also a scam to fear and generally more dangerous than the disease to be avoided.
The most difficult thing with cancer is to heal without remission.

Here it is just, a certain number of cancers are only remissions (sometimes on fairly long terms, but generally with a recovery around 4/5 years)
So there is no mystery: as Janic says, it is only temporary (in the best case) it is better to treat "the ground" first.

Always true! Bicarbonate is punctually effective (like other more or less chemical products by acting on the pH), but without deeper reform, it will often be only a remission too. But when there is an emergency and the person does not know anything else ……!
0 x

 


  • Similar topics
    Replies
    views
    Last message

Back to "Health and Prevention. Pollution, causes and effects of environmental risks "

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : gegyx and 181 guests