As for the Parisian woman who takes offense at what the Tibetans eat .... Well yes ... Typical Parisian behavior .... The kind (big shot) of those who came on vacation in my native Berry ....
You should first find out about the Parisian in question! In the letters she writes to her husband, she describes her journey to reach a Tibetan place forbidden to foreigners and even more to women (which many men would not have had the courage to follow) and under the conditions she mentions who put his life in danger every day from being attacked by looters, by the cold, by hunger. Nothing of a small fragile and delicate Parisian. So if this puts the revulse, the reasons are not his delicacy of "Parisian".
Christophe wrote: homeopathy is not over the counter ...
This is half true and false! In fact, current homeopathic products are sold over the counter in our pharmacies, but legislation (under the usual pressure from A lobbies) has reduced (and therefore prohibited sales in France) a certain number of H specialties. these latter banned, they must be brought from other countries where they are authorized.
The active ingredient is practically non-existent. Only sugar and the placebo effect remain.
http://www.bon-coin-sante.com/blog-sant ... meopathy / and given the quantities consumed, there is no risk of hyperglycemia.
Another stupidity, but let's do it!
Read better this article which ends thus (I neither credit it nor discredit it is just a quotation)
Let us repeat the figures used by the medical profession itself:
80% of illnesses are of psychosomatic origin. So if the easy way out is to spend € 1,80 to treat your soul and at the same time your body, it's still better than giving € 30 or € 50 to drug your body… It’s not your notice ?!Indeed why take drugs unnecessarily when a simple placebo would suffice?
Moreover, in the United States, the words "There is no scientific evidence that this product works" must appear on packaging
Once again, you take your desires for reality and this point has been seen and reviewed. It is not the United States which claims it, but a private organization, the FTC (so it is not the state itself), which only requests
SINCE IT CANNOT IMPOSE ANYTHING and this request must first be approved by the FDA, which is not granted to date.
And after that, would you like to be taken seriously by spreading false and distorted information by yourself?
and now consumer associations can sue "big pharma homeo" to use Janic's words. See my previous post.
As usual of the big anything!
Read at least the article you are quoting.
This only concerns Canada and for
ONE product and only one supplier, not on the therapeutic set itself.
For the article cited by that choose:
Homeopathy, Class action authorized in Quebec
The purpose of this article is not to hurt or upset users of homeopathic treatments who are often concerned with nature and truth. It is still necessary to remind them of some of these truths, namely that:
• To market a homeopathic medicine in France, it is not necessary to justify its content but only its method of manufacture: the famous Hahneman dilution. No official body (and no consumer association) controls what the granules you swallow really contain…This is partially correct, but no allopathic medicine is controlled either. As for the official body, it imposes a minimum dilution of 10.000, but does not impose anything allo, at most not to immediately kill its consumers.
• The pharmaceutical industry does not do philanthropy, but trade. Her interest is that you gobble up what she sells you. Without asking you any questions. And there is nothing to suggest that the companies that manufacture homeopathic medicines are different from the others.All right ! no industry is philanthropic, but A pushes the plug very far with exorbitant costs for certain treatments, prices not justified
http://www.medecinsdumonde.org/fr/actua ... édicaments,
which is not the case in H.
•
In addition, France is hesitant to question homeopathic treatments, since Boiron, the leading manufacturer in the world, employs thousands of people. Suddenly, despite the doubts, they are still reimbursed by Social Security up to 35%. Doubtful argument!
• In the same way, moreover, that many other conventional drugs ineffective therefore useless. and even dangerous for health.
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
