Mill wrote:bham wrote:
[...] I do not say that the profiteers, and by extension the immigrants, the urban violence are not a problem, [...]
So there, you see, I find what you say really serious ....
It is you who make this amalgamation ...
Ben no it's not me. It's still Sarko who has been nagging at us since he was inside, illegal immigrants, charters of immigrants to take home, including schoolchildren, immigration chosen, violence in the suburbs, the prevention of delinquency from kindergarten (and so on) as well as unemployed unemployed people who do not want to work. It's not me who says it, it's him, so much so that it seems to exist only that, as if it were the national plague! Reassure me, you could not miss all that.
No comment!Mill wrote: If Sarko did, I certainly did not vote for him!
Yes, indeed Sarko surrounds himself with immigrants and does not seem sectarian. But in the collective unconscious, to speak only of these "problems" is to make the citizens who are sensitive to them make a dangerous amalgamation and Sarko knows it well. Because in fact, why base its campaign on security, as it was done in 2002, when we know that the low-end "dishonest" represent 5/10% of the population?Mill wrote:Only the Left said that clean the suburbs was to be against immigrants. Immigrants are NOT more dishonest than the French. To say otherwise would indeed return to the times of the Nazis. Make cleaning is imprison rogue, not a particular community!
And dishonest high-licensed range that serve on the backs of taxpayers Pasqua style and Co., lubricating leg and arms sales commissions, say to you what of that? Me, it put me mustard. internal security laws in March 18 2003 (or Sarkozy Act) and the 2 Perben mars2004 have successively extended the scope of data subjects. Now, the Law on Internal Security (LSI) clarifies that the mere suspicion of an offense may be stuck on the only "Presumption of guilt" other than financial crime or insider trading. Interesting no! that means that there is no file for suspected major thieves !!! What do you think of Sarkozy's taking of interest and Chirac's affairs that our dear presidential candidate will try to sideline by "amnesty" for more than 10 years' affairs?
Mill wrote:bham wrote: When a law of recent agricultural orientation forbids you to use plants as natural fertilizers or pesticides, that it forbids you even to speak about it or to publish the recipes on pain of seeing the visit of customs officers or police who confiscate your computer and your hard drive!
Here I confess my ignorance: Can you tell me say more? What is the context of this law?
Go see there: https://www.econologie.com/forums/la-recette ... t2262.html
in addition she gave grist to Sarko. Or how to plant in beauty. Well yes we are not spoiled spoiled but I prefer bad things worse. 
