Limits and abuse of strikes and demonstrations ...

[perplex]

The mistake is maybe to unblock stocks and refineries (except emergency)

in 8 days nothing to eat, and I think everything will be back in order!

I doubt there are 90 days of food stock.

A ++

[bamboo]

The mistake is maybe to unblock stocks and refineries (except emergency)

in 8 days nothing to eat, and I think everything will be back in order!

What are you doing businesses that can not work anymore?
We have already had 95 boxes that had closed because they no longer receive checks from their customers.
Now, we will have boxes that will close because they can not work (craftsmen, etc.) or sell (grocery stores, restaurants, etc.).
Rents from shops or warehouses, employees, you always have to pay them.

[perplex]

What are you doing businesses that can not work anymore?
We have already had 95 boxes that had closed because they no longer receive checks from their customers.
Now, we will have boxes that will close because they can not work (craftsmen, etc.) or sell (grocery stores, restaurants, etc.).
Rents from shops or warehouses, employees, you always have to pay them.

Obligatoryly there will be some breakage in this case.

There are also "business interruption" insurance policies that unfortunately not everyone can afford. I do not know if "the national strikes" are taken care of, but it is a disaster like any other.

[chatelot16]

that's what I said opening this topic

I'm not against the right to strike, but when it comes to pressure on the state must find another way ... an anarchic blockage of the country especially harms those who are already in trouble: those who control will be the last ones!

these blockages make suffer the weakest: it will finish to kill the companies in difficulty!

what will become of the person whose car is burned and who does not have the means to buy another one?

what will become of the businessman already in trouble, whose shop is destroyed?

in addition the history of the retirement is not urgent: even if the law passes it will be still possible to correct it

the waste caused by this mess is irreparably wasteful

if we find a way to right the country properly, rectifying a bad law on retirement will be an easy detail! if we do not correct the economic situation at retirement will be useless!

[oliburn]

in any case are nice slogans at demonstrations:

"carla, we're like you, we get fucked by sarkozy"
or,
"for people above: golden balls, for people
from below: noodles again! "

here would deserve a little book all that!

[sherkanner]

in addition the history of the retirement is not urgent: even if the law passes it will be still possible to correct it

It's so beautiful naivete: snif:

[Christophe]

Speaking of law and against law: the end of the 35h is for when?

[chatelot16]

in addition the history of the retirement is not urgent: even if the law passes it will be still possible to correct it

It's so beautiful naivete: snif:

it's not me naif! we are already unable to make everyone work ... so whatever the age of retirement it will not work

as long as nothing is done to revive the economy, retirement is a detail

[sherkanner]

I should have said, it's not the fact that it's not urgent, but the fact that you think we can change afterwards that seems a little naive.

It'll do as VAT has 5.5%, roughly a shot into the water because no one applies.

[Christophe]

as long as nothing is done to revive the economy, retirement is a detail

It's not wrong but what to propose to revive? Aid and subsidies? Who are paying? Look what car manufacturers are directly or indirectly (scrap premium), yet they do not hesitate to relocate their production out of France ...

So what if ... everyone does not care about everyone's mouth?