money creation and scam income tax by Étienne Chouard

[Christophe]

And now the problem of unemployment by Chouard:

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=1665236287032790

[Ahmed]

@ Christophe.
The determinisms in question are those of the mercenary totalitarian super-organism of which we are all, to varying degrees, agents of unconscious function.
It is therefore not important (even if this may produce changes in the distribution of wealth *, it has no overall effect), that the institutions evolve in one direction or another, as long as the categories specific to this are preserved. super-organism, which are work, commodity and abstract value **, nothing can fundamentally change and we will go, as noted (?) above, with a nice involuntary double meaning, in the "ripe".

* Note that most of the critical reforms focus on these distributive aspects.
** These concepts being taken in the very particular sense that is theirs in our particular society.

[Ahmed]

Chouard is right to point out the undemocratic aspects of the European institutions and their obvious orientation towards the all-powerful markets. Admittedly, unemployment is not, to say the least, the main concern of the leaders of Europe, but it is none the less true that what has been synthesized in these institutions is not fundamentally different from what can be observed elsewhere. This implies that an exit from the EU is not a miracle cure.
Other political choices could have minimized the impact of unemployment, but the use of Keynesian strategies, which are the spearhead of Attac and many other movements, only prove that these people cling to ideas anachronistic that can no longer operate in the current context, no more than the opposite, the austerity policy that is imposed by those who do not suffer ...
As always, there is a small set of possibilities on which the different political currents are concentrated, but the essential is elsewhere: the increasing impossibility for capital to reproduce in an increased way (to invest profitably in companies other than artifices, bubbles or scams) ...

[pedrodelavega]

Give credit to this populist Chouard, that's common sense too? http://tempsreel.nouvelobs.com/societe/ ... ouard.html

And Philippe Seguin was also a populist?

I regret his links with Soral, I was not aware ...

But when you want to get rid of your dog, you say he has rabies ...

But if he really does, what do we do?
https://conspishorsdenosvies.noblogs.org/post/2011/09/14/etienne-chouard-et-ses-inspirateurs-dextreme-droite/

[Obamot]

To say that someone would be anti-Semitic does not make much sense.

We are all of Semitic origins: Jews, Arabs and even Christians !!
So anti-Semites are often " Anti-them » without even realizing it.
It's sad and silly to be so uneducated and risk dying because of that!

[Christophe]

But if he really does, what do we do?

He certainly has a rage for ... the truth ... We would have to talk about it with JF Kennedy (who wanted to reform the FED) ... ah bin no it's too possible there ... or so with spiritualism!

Mouhahahaha !!!

[izentrop]

A very disguised truth to mask the true causes and consequences of a complex situation by designating scapegoats.

[Obamot]

It is not a question of designating scapegoats, it is first of all a matter of establishing the facts, then, after analysis, of seeing the causal relationships, the how and why of money creation, the debt, the regale on this debt as a private tax, since the debt will be reimbursed by part of the tax! And after this "generous fact / compromise" will the perpetrators of the perpetual airplane game be torn up?

► View Text

(like for example GoIdman & $ achs >>> for the bribes in the Greece affair? And Chouard is undoubtedly right on certain points, but it is not because it is the largest bank in the world, run by Jews, that that would be the reason why they would be thugs. No, we are ugly, first of all because we are ugly, it has nothing to do with one's religious affiliation (after social cohesion and belonging, who cares we are in a secular / atheist society , we do what we want, and the individual as such no longer exists!). And besides, who said they would be mobsters? No corpse, no crime!) In short, no, it is useless to hunt (face) scapegoats all these people are respectable (compared to the canons of current society) Responsible? That's another question, personal (so we won't talk about it) in the face of their conscience! Those who want to criticize, they just have to change society "by entering politics", like this courageous and charming Hollande who did not sell his atheist soul (?) to the devil, no, no ... (electoral promises, nothing serious, who cares ...) who after the Charlie Hebdo attacks, did not hesitate for a single second to go and meditate in a syn .... mosque alongside Netanyahu, that's the real egalitarian politik, you have to go and meditate where we can we will always be welcome

In short, it will be necessary to behave like "wise men" (the storming of the Bastille is over) and take care to refrain from any interpersonal appreciation (which would not be serious, here nobody is playing a double game, we are in an ethical debate with interlocutors who post openly, lol). And all the same, the most important thing: it has even less to do with being xenophobic.

[Remundo]

Chouard is one of the most effective dissenters both for the originality of his ideas, but especially for his breakthrough and strong influence on the internet, as such the power attacks indirectly through media and pushes him in the 3 ropes time
1) of xenophobia,
2) fascist
3) then supreme insult, anti-Semitism.

And beware of the Obs, it is the media arm of the Socialist Party.

@+

[izentrop]

Chouard is one of the most effective dissenters both for the originality of his ideas, but especially for his breakthrough and strong influence on the internet, as such the power attacks indirectly through media and pushes him in the 3 ropes time
1) of xenophobia,
2) fascist
3) then supreme insult, anti-Semitism.

And beware of the Obs, it is the media arm of the Socialist Party.

@+

Everything is credible except the hand of power on the obs.