Gregconstruct wrote:Thanks for the info holy rita
maybe it is wise to read what the WIR bank says about the crisis
http://www.wir.ch/index.cfm?E54B5495505 ... A57011785C
Gregconstruct wrote:Thanks for the info holy rita
Tagor wrote:maybe it is wise to read what the WIR bank says about the crisis
http://www.wir.ch/index.cfm?E54B5495505 ... A57011785C
For an automation engineer like me, the post 1990 version of the system
monetaro-financier should, must and will continue to explode regularly because
that it is not in agreement with the BABA of sciences.
There is as much conceptual difference between how to count papuans and
arithmetic, that between arithmetic and control of the complex.
As long as we use mechanistic concepts to deal with problems
collective intelligence; we will always have the wrong tools,
ineffective, generators of misfortunes.
The papuans count anusi (a), doro in showing the index (2), doro in
showing middle finger (3), doro showing ring finger (4), etc ... They make
a conceptual mix. Behind the name "doro" are hidden several concepts
(2,3,4)
Likewise behind the word "currency" are hidden several mixed concepts: 3
concepts for Europeans, 4 concepts for Americans and a 5th, the
most important has been officially recognized for 2 years with the Observatory
of the Immaterial.
1- Stallion
2- Means of exchange
3- Savings method
4- Means of credit (reflects the significant psychological weight of the future at
Americans)
5- Means of assessing the intangible value.
Another way to highlight problem # 1 to deal with: "know
what we are talking about ", is to look at the definitions of money.
"It's a commodity" - 1995 version of the Banque de France - concept
perfectly consistent with the German name (Wärung which comes from die Ware the
merchandise; which also gave the name of the currency of Wörgl: the
Warei).
"This is information" - version 2003 from Greco; book "Money"
"It's a set of rules" - 2008 version of the book "Analysis
of financial crises "analyzed by a professor at the Sorbone: Mr
Pluchart for the DFCG (Association of Financial Directors and Controllers
Management).
FOR ME, IT WOULD BE ABANDONED THIS WORD - CURRENCY - WHICH IS TOO CONFUSED AND
LEAVE EITHER NEED - very broad to define - EITHER TAKE A WORD OR A
LOCATION CLOSE TO CURRENCY, BUT DIFFERENT ....
Proposal ... to be discussed ...
I have found that using the phrase "family of" ... goes by itself. >>>
DO YOU LIKE TO
- family of bio-currencies ... which may have a "currency ancestor"
commodity ".
- Tounaies family (Allneys in English).
Advantage of the 1st: by speaking "organic", we evoke several concepts
friendly, like the durable - recyclable suitable for "child money
fondant "; we also evoke the fundamental idea for the
creation of value: "value" is the child of the confrontation between
"potentials" and "people". We can say that the value is the result of a
love story ... long quiet river or very tumultuous like everyone
know.
Advantage of the 2nd: MONnaie contains "my", a symbol of selfishness typical of
behavior of
owners of currency .. The opposite of "MY" could be "ALL" .. The
Tounaie would be turned towards all
members ... which seems to me the intended target ....
Your thoughts are welcome ...
Claude PERIGAUD
Perigaud.claude@wanadoo.fr
Back to "Economy and finance, sustainability, growth, GDP, ecological tax systems"
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 146 guests