Food waste, another example: fish

[Grelinette]

I usually go around the food shops in my town to recover unsold food (bread, fruit, vegetables) that I give to my animals (horses, chickens, rabbits).

Every time I go to pick up bags of bread in one of the bakeries (a very well-known bakery network), the staff question is always the same: "that's why? ...", to which I answer: "it's for my animals!".

I asked why they asked me this question ... The answer: "Because if it is to redistribute or give for human consumption, we have no right to give it!". Clearly, my pets have rights that the poor do not!

In short, each time, same question, and same answer.

Nevertheless, once in my house I sort the bread, and almost all the unsold bread is in the morning or the day before. As much to tell you that even if it is not fresh, it is still very good especially the large country breads that remain consumable several days. I put them aside and I bring them to a shelter for homeless near my home.

For the moment everyone is happy. As long as it's hard. But it would be so much simpler for all those discarded foods to be donated and consumed by those who can not afford them.

There should be a law that obliges to give the unsold to the charities!

[dedeleco]

Or at least sell this bread a little stale 10 cheaper to poor!

My bread that I make myself, multi-grain organic flour, delicious, very expensive, with 5 times less salt than bakers, who put too much salt, is good 3 days, and on a piece of bread, a week old , coriaceous, just spend 30 seconds microwave oven for it to become soft and good!

No crumb of lost !!

The stale bread, like a pebble, passed the microwave becomes good again !!

[Janic]

the microwave? Lab animals, tested for their resistance to carcinogens, refused to take the food passed in the microwave until hunger pushes them to consume any: 100% death result; those who ate these same foods cooked in the pressure cooker scored 50% of deaths and those who ate only the same foods cooked over low heat (-110 ° or uncooked) scored 0% of deaths.
It should be reflected on this kind of technology that not only cooks brains with cell phones or sterile sperm already rare.

[dedeleco]

Hello janic,
And as usual, janic is in an extreme blur in his assertions, without references, without links, without indicating which animals, always unscientific, to believe elecubrations without any possibility of checking.

The ability to verify and prove is fundamental, otherwise it is arbitrary beliefs !!

[Janic]

dedeleco hello

Hello janic,
And as usual, janic is in an extreme blur in his assertions, without references, without links, without indicating which animals, always unscientific, to believe elecubrations without any possibility of checking.

The ability to verify and prove is fundamental, otherwise it is arbitrary beliefs !!

Search (with plenty of info on the internet) and you'll find!

[Leo Maximus]

the microwave? Lab animals, tested for their resistance to carcinogens, refused to take the food passed in the microwave until hunger pushes them to consume any: 100% death result; those who ate these same foods cooked in the pressure cooker scored 50% of deaths and those who ate only the same foods cooked over low heat (-110 ° or uncooked) scored 0% of deaths.
It should be reflected on this kind of technology that not only cooks brains with cell phones or sterile sperm already rare.

That's completely wrong, of course.

I demonstrated on several forums and also in agricultural high schools that microwave cooking had no harmful effect on food products.

We should sue those who peddle this kind of bullshit.

[dedeleco]

the microwave? Lab animals, tested for their resistance to carcinogens, refused to take the food passed in the microwave until hunger pushes them to consume any: 100% death result; those who ate these same foods cooked in the pressure cooker scored 50% of deaths and those who ate only the same foods cooked over low heat (-110 ° or uncooked) scored 0% of deaths.
It should be reflected on this kind of technology that not only cooks brains with cell phones or sterile sperm already rare.

That's completely wrong, of course.

I demonstrated on several forums and also in agricultural high schools that microwave cooking had no harmful effect on food products.

We should sue those who peddle this kind of bullshit.

Some are more peremptory and definitive than me !!!

But what I can say is that if it were true, even a little bit, I would already be dying to eat the dandelions by the root !!!
and do not run or pedal 200m with elevation gain in less than 15 minutes.

Finally the typical answer of c ... by janic:

Search (with plenty of info on the internet) and you'll find!

allows to collect all the c ..., inconsistencies and beliefs, put on the internet by people and magazines like janic affectionne, without verifiable rigorous scientific basis, which, in their floods, drown the studies and serious scientific articles, observing the reality that everyone can check, if it is not blocked by an almost religious and dogmatic mindset !!!!

Janic did not understand and equate the difference between beliefs, dreams, and serious scientific demonstration work, which requires patience and hard work.

janic did not still not understood the scientific method, with the rigor and the care necessary, not mixing its feelings, instincts, dogmatic religions, with the objective study in depth of the reality :

The ability to verify and prove is fundamental, otherwise it is arbitrary beliefs !!

which makes Janic make terrible salads, mixing everything, true, imaginary and absurd and dogmatic beliefs.

[Janic]

But what I can say is that if it were true, even a little bit, I would already be dying to eat the dandelions by the root !!!

and do you think you are a pseudo scientist?
For your instruction, laboratory tests are done on guinea pigs infected voluntarily (are you?) With an exclusive food (do you have?) And do not run the uneven .... etc ...

leo maximus hello

I demonstrated on several forums and also in agricultural high schools that microwave cooking had no harmful effect on food products.

what do you mean by harmful effect product food?

[dedeleco]

But what I can say is that if it were true, even a little bit, I would already be dying to eat the dandelions by the root !!!

and do you think you are a pseudo scientist?
For your instruction, laboratory tests are done on guinea pigs infected voluntarily (are you?) With an exclusive food (do you have?) And do not run the uneven .... etc ...

leo maximus hello

I demonstrated on several forums and also in agricultural high schools that microwave cooking had no harmful effect on food products.

what do you mean by harmful effect product food?

Always typically, and stubborn, no scientific references !!!

What's the vagueness, the nonsense, the vagueness, which changes with each specific question, to hide, to avoid confessing the wrong and the error !!

With as written by janic:

food passed to the microwave .... result 100% of deaths

I should have been dead for a long time since I warmed up good cold dishes in the microwave!


Exactly as 100% of deaths by eating poison, cyanide, full of laurel leaves, lily of the valley, holly, phalloid anamid fungi or dead flies, etc ...

[dedeleco]

Another wasted stupidity not at all counted in statistics:
all the fruits not picked up in the gardens of all of us, fruits often organic, like, quinces, apples, pears, etc., and at this moment the cherries of my cherry trees, of which I overemphasize, more than necessary, so much they are good mature on the tree, since the rest of the family do not eat enough, for fear of stomach ache, which in my opinion, is especially not like the fruits, by conditioning the bad taste of junk food which does a lot worse in the long run !!

The jams are much worse.
Especially with my 200 quince kimos of last fall in jams to resorb !!