Yeah but cabbage produces methane
without hydraulic fracturing?
Having pushed mimicry to adopt his biorhythm, his behavior and therefore his way of thinking, as well as eating the same diet as Steve Jobs (it must be said that he is already almost his double physically ...>), he ended up in the hospital with a completely broken pancreas! Strange...
Janic wrote:Obamot helloObamot wrote:Having pushed mimicry to adopt his biorhythm, his behavior and therefore his way of thinking, as well as eating the same diet as Steve Jobs (it must be said that he is already almost his double physically ...>), he ended up in the hospital with a completely broken pancreas! Strange...
This is not strange. It's like going from the couch to high level competition all at once. Hello muscle, tendon and even bone damage.
Wanting to return to a diet more in harmony with one's physiology is good, but still it is necessary to do it progressively according to age, background, one's own metabolism, etc. If Jobs has become raw-eating VGL, hoping probably some advantages, he led a life of patachon before and it is like wanting to have a crate in good condition after having let it rust for long enough. The VG, crudism, frugivorism, make reasonable "miracles" compared to a previous state, but that does not erase the past.
Janic wrote:Now is there any way to know THE REAL way of life adopted by Jobs and his actor?
Janic wrote:Because the sensational newspapers: yuck! To have a healthy view of these lifestyles, you must have a sufficiently large panel of practitioners and compare the result with the nuances of lifestyle of each.
Janic wrote:So some are only VG out of sentimentality towards animals, but often eat anything, smoke, drink alcohol, supplement themselves with various products and medicinal forces because the health aspect is not their driving force; others are more attentive to their health, but are indifferent to the ecological impact and consume lots of chemicals as well. With regard to the AG, this is what the AADDC report suggests with its nuanced results.
Janic wrote:If not you do well to experiment, it is the only way to perceive the differences when it is practiced over a sufficiently long period.
Yes, note that it was these words that I had been saying here for a long time and by which we were not quite on the same wavelength a few months ago.
With a small nuance near, it is the case-by-case according to the "individual characteristics". So indeed, it would not have scientific value in front of a college of experts, but they cannot deny the "Cambridge study" on China, which has already proved everything! (It is mentioned in the report of Dr. Caldwell Esselstyn seen on Planète +)
Janic wrote:
Now is there any way to know THE REAL way of life adopted by Jobs and his actor?
During his frugivorist period it seems ...
Yes but still, I note that in both cases, this happened with subjects still very young!
In the case of Steve Jobs, he will have eaten more than half of his life relatively in the same way, his metabolism should therefore theoretically have had time to adapt, for his own will.
And in the other, we are dealing with a subject who had not chosen his food bowl of his free will, but for the needs of the film ...
Janic wrote:Obamot, reObamot wrote:Yes, note that it was these words that I had been saying here for a long time and by which we were not quite on the same wavelength a few months ago.
Because at the start you assumed that I came in opposition to your point of view and especially your experience through certain personalities, but it is true that we have more in common than differences.
Janic wrote:Obamot wrote:With a small nuance near, it is the case-by-case according to the "individual characteristics". So indeed, it would not have scientific value in front of a college of experts, but they cannot deny the "Cambridge study" on China, which has already proved everything! (It is mentioned in the report of Dr. Caldwell Esselstyn seen on Planète +)
Don't you want to talk about the Campbell report instead?
Janic wrote:Only, the LV, for the most part and especially among those who have been practicing for a long time, it is not the expertise that counts, nor the studies (even favorable) but the experience.
Janic wrote:I wouldn't say we don't care, but just that a study confirming a situation is rather late for those who found themselves in a real situation and had to make choices that can involve a lifetime. So an ideal, as ideal as it is, is not a guarantee of success if it is not experienced (sometimes with bugs… it happens) otherwise it remains just an intellectual approach.
Janic wrote:Obamot wrote:Janic wrote:Now is there any way to know THE REAL way of life adopted by Jobs and his actor?
During his frugivorist period it seems ...
Yes but still, I note that in both cases, this happened with subjects still very young!
Age is not the main criterion. To explain what vital capital is in individuals, I take the example of an opaque bottle containing a certain amount of liquid and the way of life consists in drilling a more or less important hole in this bottle. A sparse bottle with a small hole will last as long as a full bottle with a larger hole.
And a bottle with a big hole, which at some point is reduced, will only lengthen its flow time, but will not fill the bottle either.
Janic wrote:Obamot wrote:In the case of Steve Jobs, he will have eaten more than half of his life relatively in the same way, his metabolism should therefore theoretically have had time to adapt, for his own will.
Precisely not, in any case without certainty, everything depends on the state where the individual was when he changed his lifestyle, in what proportion, with what means, etc ... my experience has allowed me to meet everything and anything on the subject, but everyone has to lead their life as they see fit and therefore sometimes silence is required.
Janic wrote:Obamot wrote:And in the other, we are dealing with a subject who had not chosen his food bowl of his free will, but for the needs of the film ...
I can not take into account the second case given the way it happened, it is as if an actor, to put himself in the shoes of his character, serial killer, became murderous.
Janic wrote:To all the people I meet face to face, through an intermediary or now on the Internet and who ask me for advice, I recommend caution and above all progressiveness depending on their health history. (except vital emergency because when there is a fire we do not look to wet the furniture, however some believe that a bucket of water will be enough to extinguish the fire)
Janic wrote:This is what bothers me a little on this subject when one or more products are considered miraculous in themselves (anti oxidants, anti cancer as we say anti viral, anti febrifuge, etc ... (result of the distortion that Western medicine distilled in the minds of patients and caregivers) as if this provided the key to this "pathology", on one side of cabbage and on the other a beer (I am not referring to anyone! )
This is the Campbell report in question and which deserves to be better known by the general public, if only its introduction.Janic wrote:
Don't you want to talk about the Campbell report instead?
I can't rewind, since it was only after I started recording ... But if it was in this report that it was highlighted that there were certain cancer pathologies that disappeared from one region to another depending on eating habits (and therefore excessive consumption of animal products), so yes, this is it
I said late for those who died BEFORE that reports (which could have prevented these deaths) were published. So let's not wait for reports, even favorable ones, let's act first even at the risk of making a mistake (which is improbable when we rely on the experience and experience of its predecessors.)Late? Who can say, since it fluctuates from one subject to another (?) Notwithstanding the Chinese study ... Regarding whoever would like to get started, the best would be to say "that it’s never too late to do well. ” Even if quite honestly, having never done anything for your health doesn't bode well.Janic wrote:
I wouldn't say we don't care, but just that a study confirming a situation is rather late for those who found themselves in a real situation and had to make choices that can involve a lifetime. So an ideal, as ideal as it is, is not a guarantee of success if it is not experienced (sometimes with bugs… it happens) otherwise it remains just an intellectual approach.
So I don't know the recipe.In some cases, favorable but rare, WE CAN GIVE A LITTLE FLEET and at the same time act on the diameter of the hole. Otherwise we could not cure allergies for example (well it is a personal conviction on what I experienced).Janic wrote:
Age is not the main criterion.
Certainly, the living have amazing faculties to repair our mistakes, but for the moment no one knows if it is at the expense of something else, because these repairs inevitably draw on capital.Rather, I see it as the body's ability to restore balance, where instability occurs (and it happens all the time, every day, all of its life). It is only when the body can no longer respond to the "stress" that it is undergoing that pathologies develop (or even to the final stage).
As the Assumed HIV which has still not been found!After all we will not be surprised at the emergence of filth like HIV or cancer, in these veritable quasi-conditions of self-destruction which have an amplifying effect ...
I share this opinion, sow and do not worry about what will be harvested. What escapes us are the conditions that will be favorable or not, to the growth and in some it will never grow, that's life!No comment. In any case if you succeed, you are very lucky, I have never yet managed to really make someone aware, even with the method of "without wanting to touch it". Ah, yes, only once, but the person had already heard of the "good" method. Like what the discussions are not useless, the ideas must make their way and that people are receptive!Janic wrote:
To all the people I meet face to face, through an intermediary or now on the Internet and who ask me for advice, I recommend caution and above all progressiveness depending on their health history. (except vital emergency because when there is a fire we do not look to wet the furniture, however some believe that a bucket of water will be enough to extinguish the fire)
Janic wrote:This is the Campbell report in question and which deserves to be better known by the general public, if only its introduction.Obamot wrote:Janic wrote:Don't you want to talk about the Campbell report instead?
I can't rewind, since it was only after I started recording ... But if it was in this report that it was highlighted that there were certain cancer pathologies that disappeared from one region to another depending on eating habits (and therefore excessive consumption of animal products), so yes, this is it
Campbell Report.pdf
Janic wrote:So i don't know the recipeObamot wrote:In some cases, favorable but rare, WE CAN GIVE A LITTLE FLEET and at the same time act on the diameter of the hole. Otherwise we could not cure allergies for example (well it is a personal conviction on what I experienced).
Janic wrote:Certainly, the living has amazing faculties to repair our mistakes, but for now nobody knows if it is at the expense of something else,Obamot wrote:Rather, I see it as the body's ability to restore balance, where instability occurs (and it happens all the time, every day, all of its life). It is only when the body can no longer respond to the "stress" that it is undergoing that pathologies develop (or even to the final stage).
Janic wrote:Because these repairs inevitably draw on capital.
Janic wrote:As the Assumed HIV which has still not been found!Obamot wrote:After all we will not be surprised at the emergence of filth like HIV or cancer, in these veritable quasi-conditions of self-destruction which have an amplifying effect ...
Janic wrote:so I could see that those who, at the beginning, accused me [...] very slowly turned gown [...]
Christophe wrote:After the Nuts, the mango!
(...)
Eating a ripe mango 20 minutes before a joint increases the effects tenfold
Strange, isn't it? And yet, it has been shown that myrcene, an active ingredient of plant origin, helps THC molecules to circulate in the blood, facilitating them quick and efficient access to your brain.
Back to "Sustainable consumption: responsible consumption, diet tips and tricks"
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 91 guests