Hic wrote:SixK wrote:
For TV screens, must see, the value I saw for the LCD, it is 55W to 180W depending on the size of the screen.
We stay very close to TV consumption. Sometimes even we are curiously above.
And LCD TVs are much more expensive than tube TVs ...
SixK
Hi sixk
Today it is LCD screens -> to "LED" <-
who consume the least !!
With a better image. (TV and computer)
OLEDs even less, but still too expensive to buy,
(they will be cheaper to manufacture than LCDs)
There you have to put things in perspective: my old Thomson 72cm 3/4 100hz high-end television consumed 158w / h, my new Sony 117cm 200hz LCD television consumes 166w / h (with a new low consumption tube backlight because the old 117 200hz consumed 240w. ..) is roughly the same consumption as the old CRT but with a 2x larger image!
Do not want butter and butter money and in addition the c .. of the farmer ...
LED backlight screens are still considerably more expensive, to stay in the same range as my screen, it's 500 € more for a not phenomenal difference in quality (my screen is already very good) and a conso barely less ... When at low cost LEDs their image quality is not better than mine and the backlighting made up of PERIPHERAL LEDs placed in the frame, the light being diffused by a mirror, the LEDs high range have the rear panel covered with LED it is not necessarily the same ...
Modern plasma also consumes an equal screen size 2x less than 2 years ago (Panasonic / Pioneer neo PDP 400hz plasma), i.e. 300-350x / h instead of 5-600w / h ...
OLEDs would be ideal, but the only one currently available on the market is very small, 11 inches, and costs a fortune ... a demo model with 3m diagonal was presented, but not marketed ...