Here I bring water to the machismo ambient
In my (big) box the boss has become fashionable by making women climb and / or by having it hired outside ....
This is called affirmative discrimination and therefore artificial in essence.
The majority of these new managers, who were totally unpopulated, drowned, confusing authority and authoritarianism, harassing subordinate men and women for the misfortune of the whole edifice: the box, themselves, men and women under their hierarchical authority.
In short, a great mess for everyone.
Result: after 1 then 2 some failures were put up, others "turned" with elegance, ie recasée to the competition or in the group like hot potatoes.
On the ben lot ... it's as if the normal selection had played 20% approximately proved to be suitable for positions
Exactly as if we had climbed a single blow of a single 100 guys unprepared for the management there would have been 20% who would have done so.
In the end we regressed because we lost time, we caused tension, absenteeism, resentment or even hatred (I do not know if it is a characteristic of the female but I do not know a single subaltern women ready to forgive the evil that was done to them in particular because the damage has repercussions in ricochet on their family circles, often sacred, and with reason, in our ladies)
We just apply modes without any discernment or reflection of any kind just to do well to say that we have 50 / 50 of women managers.
Instead of slowly evolving this percentage we put a big boost by doing anything to finally serve what to the 1er chief ??? The cause of the women themselves.
Those that have been fired are destroyed because their reputation will follow them 10%
Those that have been put up are destroyed (except the salary anyway) because they are well aware that they have failed. 10%
Those who are still in position and who are unfit are morally exhausted because they have the majority of their teams back 30%
Stay about 30% who try to manage at best without making too many waves
And the 20% who deserved their promo who are unanimous
We should have promoted these 20% there
Well train and prepare the following 30% with expected managerial takeover in about 3 years
And select severe in the 50% by making them progress in small touches and see how it went
Exactly as we have done so far without any gender discrimination.
Not to mention that in order to reach the quotas, some of them ... were not really starting, saying that if they did not accept their promotions, their careers would be damaged ...
In short, pure stupidity.