Strategy for manipulating the population and opinion in 10 rules

[perplex]

How rude person.

The real challenge is to move all bor ..

According c'que I read lot like a stalled guys! You f'rai p'tète better now start with your big move bor ... meme yourself ... instead of given advice ... Môssieur prof

a topical case, er typical of article 8

[Christophe]

I would rather say a mixture between 5 and 6 ...

5 / Addressing the public as to children in low-age
6 / Appeal to the emotional rather than thinking

Didn't understand his aggressiveness towards you? Did you steal his girlfriend or what?

[I Citro]

It is also one of the cases of manipulation of the masses: DIVIDING FOR BETTER RULING.

Designate minority communities (who do not know how to defend themselves) as responsible for pitting people against each other ...

This is another way to divert attention from the real enemy ...

[Christophe]

It's not wrong Citro!

Roh quovadis, Vîl Manipulator!

[perplex]

Slts,

For his girlfriend, rest assured I have what I need at home….
Si quovadis makes humor, it is well tried
Or it is an alias which does not like my remarks and which would like to keep its virginity (more probable)

A ++

[quovadis]

Roh quovadis, Vîl Manipulator!

tsss, no but a little startled from what I read:

... don't take himself for the tail of a pear the "pawn", I don't really like guys who make disinformation by treating others to do so, who take sides with readers by taking them for idiots, play it off with their pride by accusing others of being smug, suggesting that others have been caught with their hands in the bag when it is they who have been, rotting the threads by accusing others of rotting them :

lie and are completely twisted. You put them in which categories those who write this:

Mister is likely,
[...]

Personally, my words, remain my words, and I leave it to the reader to interpret yours.

Seeing the deformation you just made, you discredit yourself forever in my case!


Monsieur surely wanted to do an "Obamot"
Good blah blah without me!

Certainly, but when you have a few brats in front of you whose intellectual background hardly exceeds that of primary education, it is to be feared that too much reasoning will be within their reach ...

That is not enough, of course! (we immediately see the SUPERIOR man)

I'm pretty glad you recognized yourself!

Come on, take your figaro, and give us your summary, the days are long, ………….

You were caught in the jar of jam, let's not talk about it anymore!
No need to rot this post any longer

MDR, then what case there? I think we can dedicate the 10 rules to him with bonus ego to block, and head to slap

(I had made a pose of this forum because of Recy, but some are much worse).

[perplex]

That's what I thought, your words are heavy, and (HS) and Obamot is tall enough to defend himself, which he does very well.
If you did not understand it I am straight so you have no chance, I remind you that the GayPridre 2011 is scheduled for June 25 in Paris or you can do your circus.
And if you want to continue this greasy-ieux exchange, I suggest the MP instead.

PS:
The origin of the serious moral wound which some endure, comes from the fact that I simply asked the question to make a poll on 9/11.

Lots of hatred and misunderstanding for very little.
it takes everything to make a world, actually it will not be simple ..............

A ++

[quovadis]

Well done, denial fits you like a glove, but know that I am not interested in your phallocratic words nor in your "polls" until the big deviation of your "gay" parable. On the other hand I offer you:



http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Point_Goodwin

because your apology has absolutely nothing to do with another thread or someone else, skillful manipulator ...

this:

If you did not understand it I am straight, I remind you that the GayPridre 2011 is scheduled for June 25 in Paris or you can do your circus.
And if you want to continue this greasy-ieux exchange, I suggest the MP instead.

that's right:

1 / The strategy of diversion

[Christophe]

... don't take himself for the tail of a pear the "pawn", I don't really like guys who make disinformation by treating others to do so, who take sides with readers by taking them for idiots, play it off with their pride by accusing others of being smug, suggesting that others have been caught with their hands in the bag when it is they who have been, rotting the threads by accusing others of rotting them :

lie and are completely twisted.

Can we know what you're causing?

1) Already it seems to me that one of the basic rules of a forum it is to respect the subject of the subject on which you write and it is not a place of settlement of account, if you want to settle your accounts you do it by email or MP.

There you reproach perplex for things that were written here and there (in a "sulphurous" subject) and of which, sorry, but I find it difficult to see the connection with this subject.

2) For Godwin's threshold you are completely delirious my dear ...

3) Your little bastard completely spoils this subject ...

[quovadis]

1) Houla ... already it seems to me that one of the basic rules of a forum is to respect the subject of the subject on which you write.

sorry don't see it as an offense, but:
- manipulates him,
- I gave examples.
- therefore directly related to the subject of the thread.

2) For Godwin's threshold you are completely delirious my dear ...

hence the Godwin point.

Your little bugger completely spoils this subject ...

I believe his skill is to declare war. Re-reading is edifying.

Well I'm leaving you.