Returns Scroll Stop Automatic mode

Company and PhilosophyFrançois Roddier, thermodynamics and society

philosophical debates and companies.
User avatar
sen-no-sen
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5553
Registration: 11/06/09, 13:08
Location: High Beaujolais.
x 211

Re: François Roddier, thermodynamics and society

Unread Messageby sen-no-sen » 04/06/18, 16:51

125 - When birds do not educate their children anymore.
3 June 2018 François Roddier

The biologist Konrad Lorentz (1903-1989) had noticed that when they become very numerous, the birds do not educate their children anymore.

Birds are among the most advanced animals in creation, soon after mammals. Like the monkeys, they are capable of imitation. This allows them to educate their children. Thus, each family has a particular song that distinguishes it from other families. Biologists have shown that imitation can provoke altruistic behavior, thanks to a selection of so-called cultural kinship.

For example, at the approach of an eagle, a small bird will scream. In doing so he draws the eagle's attention to him and puts his life in danger. This behavior can in no way be of genetic origin because, if it were, it would quickly lead to the disappearance of the gene in question. It is therefore necessarily of the cultural type (it is transmitted by imitation). It allows the safeguarding of the species as a whole.

Altruistic behavior involves social behavior. The latter is particularly visible in migratory birds when, in the autumn, they gather before facing the crossing of a sea. Such behavior is useful for the conservation of the species. If, on the other hand, social behavior puts the species in danger, the so-called natural selection of relatives will tend to eliminate it.

When a bird species becomes very large, it depletes its food resources and endangers its existence. Parent selection will tend to eliminate this behavior. Since the choice of food is a cultural behavior transmitted by education, an uneducated baby will be more likely to adopt a different food than that of his parents. This would explain why, when they are very numerous, the birds do not educate their children anymore.

Would it be the same for the human species? This seems very likely. In one or two generations, a few tractors have replaced hundreds of farm workers. We do not read, we listen to the radio or we watch television. We do not write anymore, we send SMS text messages. We do not count, we take his calculator. Reading, writing, counting have become knowledge of another age. We became completely dependent on the technique.

This has allowed our species to multiply at an unprecedented rate. Unfortunately, it causes the depletion of our fossil resources, the loss of our biodiversity and global warming. Today we only transmit knowledge related to the technique. We forget to learn to think. Our elite no longer seek to understand, but to develop new technologies. To continue to transmit this knowledge does not put our species in danger?

There was a time when going to graduate school guaranteed a job. This is no longer the case today. Long and expensive studies no longer appear as such an attractive cultural food. Some young people go on to higher education, others stop after baccalaureate. In a society that is in danger of collapsing, can we say today those who will do best? If, genetically, we are only one species, culturally we are many. The selection of cultural parentage will decide the future of our children.

History tells us that there was a precedent. Shortly before Jesus Christ, Julius Caesar spoke and wrote fluently Latin and Greek. Three centuries later, Emperor Maximilian 1er wrote Latin badly and did not know Greek. In 518 AD the Byzantine Emperor Justin 1er could neither read nor write. When I was little, I was taught the song: "The good king Dagobert put his pants upside down ...". It is only with Charlemagne that we finally realize the importance of education. Shortly before his death, he tried to learn to read.

Just as the disappearance of an animal population is identified with the disappearance of its genes, so the end of a civilization is identified with the end of its culture. The end of the Roman Empire gives us an illustration. It is time to understand it and change the way we educate our children. Survive those who will have the basic knowledge needed to rebuild a society, at the expense of those with only technical knowledge.

http://www.francois-roddier.fr/
0 x
"Genius sometimes consists of knowing when to stop" Charles De Gaulle.

Ahmed
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6547
Registration: 25/02/08, 18:54
Location: Burgundy
x 428

Re: François Roddier, thermodynamics and society

Unread Messageby Ahmed » 04/06/18, 20:28

I note with satisfaction that François Roddier progressively and pertinently deepens the thermodynamic interpretative grid.
0 x
"Do not believe above all that I tell you."
Janic
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5832
Registration: 29/10/10, 13:27
Location: Burgundy
x 59

Re: François Roddier, thermodynamics and society

Unread Messageby Janic » 05/06/18, 07:48

We forget to learn to think.
Or rather the mode, the way of thinking has changed. The contribution of knowledge by the technique, because all our knowledge passes by this one now, directs this way of thinking. Agriculture of the 18 ° and before, was not based on productivism because of the limit represented by animal traction, which was canceled by mechanical traction and chemical fertilizers; health was based on the use of "simple" and other natural means replaced by chemicals galore (and the utopian vaccination with these same chemicals and its chain practice); displacements can not be done only at high speed (TGV, ultra powerful cars) or even slower than a snail by its traffic jams and where all this is considered normal compared to these technical achievements. But the technique also started with the club, with the fire, with the hunt and the clothing. To relearn to think is also to decondition our current way of thinking, but who can really?
Should we even go back without technique? : Shock:
0 x
"We do science with facts, as is a house with stones, but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a heap of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
"Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence" Exnihiloest
Ahmed
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6547
Registration: 25/02/08, 18:54
Location: Burgundy
x 428

Re: François Roddier, thermodynamics and society

Unread Messageby Ahmed » 05/06/18, 10:03

If the comparison made by F. Roddier is very interesting, I have to issue more than just reservations on the merits. Certainly, in the recent past, studies were more oriented towards non-technical knowledge, what was then called the "humanities". However, we must not delude ourselves about the critical capacity of this orientation, because it was reserved to form an "elite" and served above all as a discriminatory factor, a sign of recognition within the ruling class (hence the connection with jobs), like the disproportionate nails of Chinese scholars ...
This amply demonstrates that these studies were not opposed to the deployment of technology, these are the facts: far from being a brake on this development, these agents contributed powerfully to its advent.
Of course, the acceleration of the technique required to move to a higher stage and to mobilize more forces and, in a much more competitive context of massive access to education, mathematics has ousted ancient Greek as a criterion selective.
I therefore think that the abandonment of classical studies and their potential * critical aspect is not the indirect cause of this technological addiction, on the contrary they constituted a preliminary stage.

* Very potential, since we saw that this criticism went against the class interests of their holders.
0 x
"Do not believe above all that I tell you."


 


  • Similar topics
    Replies
    views
    Last message

Back to "Society and Philosophy"

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and guest 1

Other pages that will certainly interest you: